Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   200NL-6Max AQs vs possible squeeze. (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=527492)

JasonP530 10-20-2007 11:44 PM

200NL-6Max AQs vs possible squeeze.
 
240 effective. Oppoenent is 38/30 over a small sample.

I raise UTG to $8with AQs and 2 people cold call. Villian in the SB makes it $44. Should I just fold it there, or is it a squeeze/he folds his range enough for me to reraise? If you were going to reraise, would you shove?

If I shove, there is $100 in dead money, so if he calls the rest, I need to win about ~40%. I am only 2-1 dog against JJ+/AK. Should I just give it up or is it worth a reraise/shove?

How much does this change if the villian is 25/17?

Thanks,
Jason

ofishstix 10-20-2007 11:46 PM

Re: 200NL-6Max AQs vs possible squeeze.
 
vs a 38/30 i am always shoving here. vs a 25/17 it depends a lot more on history/flow, etc

JasonP530 10-21-2007 12:07 PM

Re: 200NL-6Max AQs vs possible squeeze.
 
Better to reraise, or shove at this level?

monkover 10-21-2007 12:18 PM

Re: 200NL-6Max AQs vs possible squeeze.
 
against a TAG i´m folding this all day long. against a 38/30 I´m taking this to the felt though.
I prefer shoving b/c with any decently sized reraise you commit yourself to the pot anyways and will have to shove flops ui.

sh58 10-21-2007 01:19 PM

Re: 200NL-6Max AQs vs possible squeeze.
 
i just usually 4bet 3x and shoving any flop. i do this with all my 4bets, because it allows me to 4bet/fold when i have total air

piotrmatic 10-21-2007 05:34 PM

Re: 200NL-6Max AQs vs possible squeeze.
 
Shove it against a 38/30 PF

pdoran10 10-21-2007 05:44 PM

Re: 200NL-6Max AQs vs possible squeeze.
 
yeah shoving is fine here. against a tighter opponent i really need reads to do anything but fold.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.