variance question for david sklansky
 

player A gets KK 10x in a row and wins all in preflop v aa each time at nl 100.

player a than moves up to nl 1000, and loses all in preflop aa v kk.

Is player A running Good, Bad, or Neutral

and why?

Re: variance question for david sklansky
 

eh this is a semantics question and sklansky is not uniquely qualified to answer. Take it up with merriam webster

Re: variance question for david sklansky
 

[ QUOTE ]
eh this is a semantics question and sklansky is not uniquely qualified to answer. Take it up with merriam webster

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT

Re: variance question for david sklansky
 

Is player A a goblerj, a klejrelk, or a erjeukidl?

Your question, with no defined terms, makes just as much sense.

Re: variance question for david sklansky
 

In addition, if I wers Sklansky, I am 100% certain I would open 0% of threads in a forum titled "Science, Math, and Philosophy" with the title, "What do I do facing this all-in bet with an overpair?" or the like.

Think about it. There are much better places for your post .

Re: variance question for david sklansky
 

how is my question not defined? its a very straight foward question

and hitch, my post is nothing like that

Re: variance question for david sklansky
 

I will provide a useful answer. He is running good since you didn't mention he has cancer or lives in sub-Saharan Africa or anything like that.

Are you starting to see why thats a silly question now? The terms dont mean anything. wtf is "running good" in this context?

Re: variance question for david sklansky
 

[ QUOTE ]
how is my question not defined?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because good and bad have very narrow well-defined meanings for every situation, ain't that right? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Re: variance question for david sklansky
 

clearly im talking about running good bad or neutral in poker and not other aspects of life...

Re: variance question for david sklansky
 

Fine, he is still running ridiculously good. Happy?