Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Poker Legislation (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=59)
-   -   Maryland and Florida Apparently Against Frank Bill (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=514898)

Coy_Roy 10-03-2007 04:07 PM

Maryland and Florida Apparently Against Frank Bill
 
http://www.gambling911.com/Maryland-...ng-100307.html

Maryland, Florida Write to Barney Frank re: Online Gambling Proposal Concerns

Maryland Attorney
General Douglas F. Gansler, together with Florida
Attorney General Bill McCollum, sent a letter to
Congressman Barney Frank and Congressman Spencer
Bachus, chairman and ranking member, respectively, of
the House Committee on Financial Services, expressing
grave concerns about H.R. 2046, the “Internet Gambling
Regulation and Enforcement Act of 2007.”

H.R. 2046 would replace state regulations of Internet
gambling with a federal licensing program that would
permit Internet gambling companies to do business with
U.S. customers – a move Attorney General Gansler and
Attorney General McCollum believe would undermine
States’ traditional powers to make and enforce their
own gambling laws. Under the proposed legislation, the
Department of Treasury would alone authorize and
regulate the federal licenses, marking the first time
in history that the federal government would be
responsible for issuing gambling licenses.

“H.R. 2046 would throw open the doors of the United
States and allow for the greatest expansion of
legalized gambling in American history,” said Attorney
General Gansler. “This attempt to divest the States of
their gambling enforcement power is sweeping and
unprecedented. We oppose this proposal, and any other
proposal that hinders the rights of States to prohibit
or regulate gambling by their residents.”

To help combat the skirting of state gambling
regulations by Internet gambling companies, 49
Attorneys General wrote to the leadership of Congress
in March of last year, urging the passage of the
Unlawful Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006. Congress
enacted the legislation, ensuring that the authority
to set overall gambling regulations and policy remains
where it has traditionally been most effective – at
the state level.

Less than a year later, H.R. 2046 would undo the
progress achieved with the passage of the Unlawful
Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 by legalizing
Internet gambling in each State, unless the Governor
clearly specifies existing state restrictions barring
Internet gambling in whole or in part. A State may
then “opt out” of legalization for all Internet
gambling or certain types of gambling. However, the
opt-out for types of gambling does not clearly
preserve the right of States to place conditions on
legal types of gambling. In addition, the opt-outs are
deceiving in that they will likely be challenged
before the World Trade Organization – an organization that has already demonstrated hostility towards U.S. restrictions on Internet gambling.

Source: Maryland Attorney General

cmitch 10-03-2007 05:00 PM

Re: Maryland and Florida Apparently Against Frank Bill
 
Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum - that is the problem.

This is the same Congressman that was pushing really hard for the Clinton impeachment. He lost a race for a senate seat a few yrs later and eventually wound up as our state attorney. Very, very far far far far right.

Legislurker 10-03-2007 08:52 PM

Re: Maryland and Florida Apparently Against Frank Bill
 
Amazing how powerful the horse lobby is in each state, huh?

Atomic 10-03-2007 11:25 PM

Re: Maryland and Florida Apparently Against Frank Bill
 
[ QUOTE ]
Amazing how powerful the horse lobby is in each state, huh?

[/ QUOTE ]

The sport of king(makers)

KEW 10-03-2007 11:38 PM

Re: Maryland and Florida Apparently Against Frank Bill
 
MD horse racing is crap...That industry is in serious need of slots and poker rooms...

DeadMoneyDad 10-04-2007 12:42 AM

Re: Maryland and Florida Apparently Against Frank Bill
 
[ QUOTE ]
Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum - that is the problem.

This is the same Congressman that was pushing really hard for the Clinton impeachment. He lost a race for a senate seat a few yrs later and eventually wound up as our state attorney. Very, very far far far far right.

[/ QUOTE ]


I think Bill against us does more than he would for us...


D$D

Coy_Roy 10-04-2007 03:28 AM

Re: Maryland and Florida Apparently Against Frank Bill
 
[ QUOTE ]


I think Bill against us does more than he would for us...


D$D

[/ QUOTE ]


Huh?

bap2086 10-04-2007 04:01 AM

Re: Maryland and Florida Apparently Against Frank Bill
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


I think Bill against us does more than he would for us...


D$D

[/ QUOTE ]


Huh?

[/ QUOTE ]
because so many people hate him in general. he works actually in a positive way.

Kurn, son of Mogh 10-04-2007 08:52 AM

Re: Maryland and Florida Apparently Against Frank Bill
 
Hate to say it, but I agree with them. Constitutionally, the Federal Government has precisely zero right to become involved in making gambling law. That is reserved to the States.

Better to get the Feds out of it completely.

canvasbck 10-04-2007 09:13 AM

Re: Maryland and Florida Apparently Against Frank Bill
 
Where were these guys when the UIGEA was passed???? If they were so worried about the fed not interfering in states rights to decide on their own about internet gambling, why did these two bozos endorse the UIGEA?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.