>1000
 

Apparently someone was running a script to jack up a view count to ridiculously high which was causing a performance problem. so yeah.

Re: >1000
 

this has exciting implications.

Re: >1000
 

BAN SCOTT HOWARD

Re: >1000
 

lol

Re: >1000
 

I'm thinking that's some Firefox ReloadEvery with a quick reload time.

Re: >1000
 

banning all of scott howards accounts would probably kill the server as well

Re: >1000
 

[ QUOTE ]
I'm thinking that's some Firefox ReloadEvery with a quick reload time.

[/ QUOTE ]
I tried that before, it didn't work. Has to be some other script

Re: >1000
 

[ QUOTE ]
banning all of scott howards accounts would probably kill off 90% of poggers

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: >1000
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
banning all of scott howards accounts would probably kill off 90% of poggers and 90% of USGers

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: >1000
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm thinking that's some Firefox ReloadEvery with a quick reload time.

[/ QUOTE ]
I tried that before, it didn't work. Has to be some other script

[/ QUOTE ]
That worked when I tried it for turbos (probably around 10 months ago). I haven't tried to use it recently though. It's possible that the last 2 FF updates broke the reload every script.