How lose do you have to be described as a LAG anymore?
 

When did anything under 35/25/4 become TAG? Can someone explain what I missed where LAGs no longer exist?

Re: How lose do you have to be described as a LAG anymore?
 

Great thread.

Re: How lose do you have to be described as a LAG anymore?
 

I think it happened on august 19th

Re: How lose do you have to be described as a LAG anymore?
 

Nowadays lag is everything looser than 20/15 it seems.

Re: How lose do you have to be described as a LAG anymore?
 

I see where you're going at, although some people are mocking you [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] The games have become so much more aggressive, for instance everyone are 3-betting very loose compared to the old standards.

Re: How lose do you have to be described as a LAG anymore?
 

I'm actually very much unclear of if I see a hand history with just a generic description of the villain (e.g., nit, TAG, LAG, aggro donk) but no stats what stats should I have in mind for that villain.

E.g.,

nit ~= 15/9 ?
TAG ~= 20/16 ?
LAG ~= 25/20 ?
aggro donk ~= 38/25 ?

Something like that?