Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Full Ring (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=80)
-   -   [NL50] 42s on AK2 (bluff reraise) (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=509867)

br.bm 09-26-2007 01:48 PM

[NL50] 42s on AK2 (bluff reraise)
 
both players have ~$60 stacks
villian seems TAG, he could see me as LAG

hero is Button w/ 42s
some folds
villian limps in middle pos
folds
hero raises to $2.25
villian calls

Flop ($5.25) AK2 (rainbow)
villian checks
hero bets $4
villian raises to $12
hero thinks ~5s and reraises to $26


Thoughts?

seki 09-26-2007 01:59 PM

Re: [NL50] 42s on AK2 (bluff reraise)
 
Seriously, you are trying to burn money.

gman339 09-26-2007 02:03 PM

Re: [NL50] 42s on AK2 (bluff reraise)
 
This is a joke right?

effang 09-26-2007 02:07 PM

Re: [NL50] 42s on AK2 (bluff reraise)
 
you should move up to nl200 where they might respect your raises.

your plays are too sophisticated for nl50, and actually probably a large reason you're playing there. i guess if the other player is really good you might fold out AQ, but i doubt it.

KurtSF 09-26-2007 02:35 PM

Re: [NL50] 42s on AK2 (bluff reraise)
 
This is bad.

42s is just total trash to me, even IP.

As played flop c-bet is fine, but you've got to give it up to the raise. You beat QJ. Villain likes his hand. Get out!

br.bm 09-26-2007 04:35 PM

Re: [NL50] 42s on AK2 (bluff reraise)
 
so 97s is total trash too?
If not, why?

Vecernicek 09-26-2007 05:36 PM

Re: [NL50] 42s on AK2 (bluff reraise)
 
[ QUOTE ]
so 97s is total trash too?
If not, why?

[/ QUOTE ]
97s is better then 42 suited:

1) 97 can make about twice as many straights
2) when it makes a flush there are less ways it can be a second- or third- best flush
3) 9 and 7, when they pair, beat many more pairs than 4 or 2 can
4) 97 is luckier

KurtSF 09-26-2007 05:41 PM

Re: [NL50] 42s on AK2 (bluff reraise)
 
[ QUOTE ]
so 97s is total trash too?

[/ QUOTE ]

Nah. I probably only make this move with 67s+ and T8s+, so its pretty marginal, but I wouldn't call it utter trash.

[ QUOTE ]
If not, why?

[/ QUOTE ]

Middle pair better than low pair.

Trips with mid-kicker better than board kicker.

Middle 2 pair better than bottom 2 pair.

9-high flush better than 4-high.

More straights to be made.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.