Which site should I play at?
 

I 4 table 2/4 - 3/6 NL. Which site should I play at?

PokerStars
Pros: Great software, great customer support
Cons: No rakeback

Party Poker:
Pros: Soft games (?)
Cons: [censored] software, bad customer support, no rakeback

Battlefield Poker (Prima Network)
Pros: Soft games, 60% rakeback
Cons: [censored] software, no table tiling

Re: Which site should I play at?
 

pokerstars is rigged

Re: Which site should I play at?
 

Gets some getting used to but Battlefield poker is not bad at all when it comes to software. You get addicted to the speed of the tables, which destroy other sites. The 128 second time bank is a very nice touch for tough spots.

Re: Which site should I play at?
 

How does Battlefield compare to Party in terms of softness?

Cheers.

Re: Which site should I play at?
 

I always thought if you were able to play at party, you should play at party.

Re: Which site should I play at?
 

FT because

Re: Which site should I play at?
 

[ QUOTE ]
How does Battlefield compare to Party in terms of softness?

Cheers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Party has a completely different style of fish than battlefield. Party players for the most part are extremely loose pf/tight post flop with 45/7 stats abound. Post flop they love to re-mini raise your cbets or donk bet into pots OOP. If this is your cup of tea, then by all means try party.

However, the problem that a lot of people share with party is their software. It tends to freeze even on top of the line computers. Really frustrating.

Re: Which site should I play at?
 

Play at UB, Tilt, Prima, (Cryptologic, iPoker) and I will be happy.