NL100 - 4-handed AT vs 3-bet
 

Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 4 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter)

SB: $83.25
BB: $98.55
Hero (UTG): $105.50
BTN: $100.40

Reads: <font color="blue">Villain seems solid. I'd been somewhat active, but I wasn't sure whether not he would be 3-betting light in a spot like this.</font>

Preflop: Hero is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (4 Players)
<font color="red">Hero raises to $4.00</font>, <font color="red">BTN raises to $12.00</font>, 2 folds, Hero calls $8.00

Flop: ($25.50) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
Hero checks, <font color="red">BTN bets $18.00</font>, Hero calls $18.00

Turn: ($61.50) 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players)
Hero checks, <font color="red">BTN bets $39.00</font>

This bet seems strong after my flop call. Easy fold?

Re: NL100 - 4-handed AT vs 3-bet
 

I definitely fold here. You only beat a bluff.

Re: NL100 - 4-handed AT vs 3-bet
 

Call me a nit but I may fold this preflop without reads.

If we call the flop we are saying that we are beating a majority of villain's range. In saying that, shouldn't we then be betting at the flop?

As played, fold Turn.

Re: NL100 - 4-handed AT vs 3-bet
 

Yeah, now that I think about it... if he had any hand that I beat he would likely check behind on the turn here as this is not a board to be 2-barreling and he would likely slowdown with a weaker A.

And yeah, I think folding pf might have been an option because this point I had no strong idea of how aggro he was.

Re: NL100 - 4-handed AT vs 3-bet
 

Everyone in the world folds this preflop even against agro's there is no value esp oop and as "Villain Seems Solid." As played easy fold.