Next AA
 

SB: 44% VP$ITP after 25 hands/PFR 0.0/AF 0.35
MP2 : 62/4.76/0.21 - 42 hands

0.15/0.30 Fixed-Limit Hold'em <font color="blue">(9 handed)</font>
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Texas Grabem 1.7 by www.pokerstrategy.cc.

Preflop: Hero is BU with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. CO posts a blind of $0.15.
<font color="grey">3 folds</font>, MP2 calls, <font color="grey">MP3 folds</font>, CO checks, <font color="red">Hero raises</font>, SB calls, <font color="grey">BB folds</font>, <font color="red">MP2 3-bets</font>, <font color="grey">CO folds</font>, <font color="red">Hero caps</font>, SB calls, MP2 calls.

Flop: (14.00 SB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(3 players)</font>
<font color="red">SB bets</font>, MP2 calls, <font color="red">Hero raises</font>, SB calls, MP2 calls.

Turn: (10.00 BB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(3 players)</font>
<font color="red">SB bets</font>, MP2 calls, <font color="red">Hero raises</font>, SB calls, MP2 calls.

River: (16.00 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(3 players)</font>
SB checks, MP2 checks, <font color="red">Hero bets</font>, SB calls, <font color="grey">MP2 folds</font>.

Final Pot: 18.00 BB

Not too much aggressive? (edited question)

Re: Next AA
 

what you mean ... u raised every chance you had ... i'd say you were as aggressive as you could have been .... i really dont understand what your asking here

Re: Next AA
 

He asked whether he should have slowed down somewhere.... No. Actually when I see SB's AF of 0.35 I'm somewhat afraid of his turn donk. But I suppose I'll play it the same.

Re: Next AA
 

Yeah the limp r/r and the turn donk probably mean something (possibly only that the vill is playing it funky) but I don't think you could do much differently.

Re: Next AA
 

MP2 open-limped into a late post = his lrr is retarded and means approximately nothing. SB's donk/call donk is either a monster or a weak pair or something that improved on the turn; at these limits it's a weak pair more often than the other two. On the river they checked to you and you have the nuts. This is perfect.

EDIT: SB's stats don't change my play at all, he could easily just have been colddecked for a couple orbits. MP2's just confirm my suspicion that MP2 is randomly getting stupid rather than needing an actual hand to do this.

Re: Next AA
 

I just call the turn donk once the same player donks into me twice, and my flop raise doesn't slow him down. Otherwise I play it the same.

Re: Next AA
 

Perfect.
Nice avatar.

Re: Next AA
 

[ QUOTE ]
I just call the turn donk once the same player donks into me twice, and my flop raise doesn't slow him down. Otherwise I play it the same.

[/ QUOTE ]

This turn donk should NOT scare you. Usual explanations for this line:

-Villain has a monster and knows this will trick you into raising
-Villain has a weak pair and sucks at poker
-Villain is trying to defend against a free card play
-Villain improved on the turn

So basically you're giving villain credit for being way smarter than I would expect anyone at .15/.30 to be, or you're putting him on exactly 66 (or possibly 6 + some part of the board but if he can have those types of hands he can also have many things you beat). His stats are irrelevant, it's 25 frickin' hands.

Re: Next AA
 

GRUNCH: Looks bog-standard to me.

Re: Next AA
 

[ QUOTE ]
This turn donk should NOT scare you. Usual explanations for this line:

-Villain has a monster and knows this will trick you into raising
-Villain has a weak pair and sucks at poker
-Villain is trying to defend against a free card play
-Villain improved on the turn

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT. Donks are so often BS. I'd guess he has a marginal Q.