Wtf, HORSE gets lower turnout?
 

I laid 5-4 on 225+, and I'm hearing they got less than 110 (last year was 168 iirc).

Decreased attendance is a sure sign that everyone in poker is busto.

Re: Wtf, HORSE gets lower turnout?
 

fwiw, last year they got 143...

Re: Wtf, HORSE gets lower turnout?
 

Spencer Sun's blog says supposedly 146 this year.

Re: Wtf, HORSE gets lower turnout?
 

last year there were (i think) about a dozen or so internet qualifiers - several of this dozen from party....

this year, i think none from any sites???

Re: Wtf, HORSE gets lower turnout?
 

From pokernews:

[ QUOTE ]
The Numbers Are In
There were 148 total entries into this year's tournament resulting in an enormous $7,104,000 prize pool. First place will be an astonishing $2,276,832, which is $492,192 more than Chip Reese took home for last year's first-place finish. If Daniel Negreanu were to take home the title, it would put him into first place on the WSOP all-time money list.


[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Wtf, HORSE gets lower turnout?
 

PokerNews:
There were 148 total entries into this year's tournament resulting in an enormous $7,104,000 prize pool. First place will be an astonishing $2,276,832, which is $492,192 more than Chip Reese took home for last year's first-place finish. If Daniel Negreanu were to take home the title, it would put him into first place on the WSOP all-time money list.

Another good sweat. I took 6-5 odds with the under at 150.

Re: Wtf, HORSE gets lower turnout?
 

[ QUOTE ]
From pokernews:

[ QUOTE ]
The Numbers Are In
There were 148 total entries into this year's tournament resulting in an enormous $7,104,000 prize pool. First place will be an astonishing $2,276,832, which is $492,192 more than Chip Reese took home for last year's first-place finish. If Daniel Negreanu were to take home the title, it would put him into first place on the WSOP all-time money list.


[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

where are they taking the extra 250k from? theres only 5 extra players this year. less rake?

Re: Wtf, HORSE gets lower turnout?
 

[ QUOTE ]
PokerNews:
If Daniel Negreanu were to take home the title, it would put him into first place on the WSOP all-time money list.

[/ QUOTE ]

This can't possibly be right, can it? DN is currently 56th on the WSOP money list. Maybe it is supposed to be the overall all-time list? Also, does this means Joe Hachem is not playing the event (since he would also pass Gold on the overall money list with another $2 million) ?

Re: Wtf, HORSE gets lower turnout?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
From pokernews:

[ QUOTE ]
The Numbers Are In
There were 148 total entries into this year's tournament resulting in an enormous $7,104,000 prize pool. First place will be an astonishing $2,276,832, which is $492,192 more than Chip Reese took home for last year's first-place finish. If Daniel Negreanu were to take home the title, it would put him into first place on the WSOP all-time money list.


[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]
less rake?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. Also, Negreanu dosen't have over $10 million in cashes @ the WSOP. More like all time $ list.

Re: Wtf, HORSE gets lower turnout?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
From pokernews:

[ QUOTE ]
The Numbers Are In
There were 148 total entries into this year's tournament resulting in an enormous $7,104,000 prize pool. First place will be an astonishing $2,276,832, which is $492,192 more than Chip Reese took home for last year's first-place finish. If Daniel Negreanu were to take home the title, it would put him into first place on the WSOP all-time money list.


[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]
less rake?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. Also, Negreanu dosen't have over $10 million in cashes @ the WSOP. More like all time $ list.

[/ QUOTE ]

Correct. But only $2.056M in WSOP events, and only $1.3M in actual WSOP events (minus this "circuit event" nonsense)? I would have thought much more.

http://www.worldseriesofpoker.com/pl...p?playerID=267