Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   STT Strategy (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   11$ - Party - 55 shorthanded (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=430171)

sence25 06-18-2007 03:01 PM

11$ - Party - 55 shorthanded
 
Whats my play here?


No-Limit Hold'em Tournament ($11), Blinds 50/100 <font color="blue">(5 handed)</font>
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Texas Grabem 1.7 by www.pokerstrategy.cc.

Seat 2: y0d4x ( 1,610 )
Seat 4: xxx13ysz ( 5,670 )
Seat 3: someone04275 ( 1,890 )
Seat 6: mjwarnock ( 4,660 )
Seat 8: KingBuzzo888 ( 6,170 )

Preflop: Hero is CO with 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
MP3 calls $100.00, <font color="grey">Hero folds</font>, <font color="red">BU raises to 450</font>, <font color="grey">3 folds</font>.

Final Pot: 700

Th3R3dDr4g0n 06-18-2007 03:39 PM

Re: 11$ - Party - 55 shorthanded
 
I would probably have played weak, and limped, then folded to the reraise. That sounds like a bad move now that I type it, but I certainly wouldn't push, and I wouldn't raise.

Calling first option, folding second option.

cardworm 06-18-2007 03:46 PM

Re: 11$ - Party - 55 shorthanded
 
U have 57 bb right?
With this stack size and two really big stacks behind I like
a limp or set value,100 doesnt really heart your stack too much.

sence25 06-18-2007 04:07 PM

Re: 11$ - Party - 55 shorthanded
 
no, i am y0d4x, i got 16bb here..
yeah, i think you could limp for a set here still but it would hurt cuz they just raise so freakin often even with mediocre hands and you dont have the odds to call then

cardworm 06-18-2007 04:33 PM

Re: 11$ - Party - 55 shorthanded
 
No 16 BB at PP 11s isnt enough to limp for set value.This is a
fold because the players u behind will see the two limps as red meat.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.