NL200 - QQ against aggressive TAG in 3-betted pot OOP
 

Info about villain:

Villain is running 22/17/6.4 (Sample size ~300 hands) and he 3-bets pretty light. No other reads.

Please comment on this:

[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Should we 4-bet PF, due to he is 3-betting light? Or should we call and let him "hang" himself with his aggression?

[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] How should we play the flop? Bet and hope he raise? Check and call? Or check raise?

[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] How should we play the turn after our actual flop play?

EverestPoker Game #1412070326: Table Suva-22 - $1.00/$2.00 - No Limit Hold'em - 15:15:51 - 2007/04/18
Seat 1: HERO ($414.90)
Seat 2: SoNo41 ($205.20)
Seat 4: Macspower ($259.75)
Seat 5: Zopopop ($334.58)
Seat 6: kurtkatt9 ($561.97)
Zopopop posts the small blind of $1.00
kurtkatt9 posts the big blind of $2.00
The button is in seat #2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to HERO[Q [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]]
HERO raises to $7.00
SoNo41 raises to $24.00
Zopopop folds
kurtkatt9 folds
HERO calls $17.00
*** FLOP *** [9 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 2 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]]
HERO checks
SoNo41 bets $39.00
HERO calls $39.00
*** TURN *** [9 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 2 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]] [K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]]
HERO checks
SoNo41 bets $75.00
HERO ?

Re: NL200 - QQ against aggressive TAG in 3-betted pot OOP
 

Personally, I'm about 50/50 between a 4-bet and a call preflop. With villain's aggression at 6.4 you can definitely squeeze more money out of him with his frequent continuation bets.

I like a flop check-raise over the other options since you are out of position.

The King on the turn sucks, you've played the hand so passively and given him the opportunity to put you in a position that commits your effective stack with that call.

Re: NL200 - QQ against aggressive TAG in 3-betted pot OOP
 

i could go either way pre-flop, but since decided to just call, now you have to c/r the flop.

as played, fold the turn. you might be ahead but you're basically just taking a shot in the dark if you call because you've been passive the whole what.

Re: NL200 - QQ against aggressive TAG in 3-betted pot OOP
 

Yes, I should have check-raised the flop, dunno why I didn't... maybe I was hoping for a blank and then CR on turn. :P

I think the turn is a fold as you guys, hence I folded.