Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   100nl JJ pf decision, meh (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=382032)

Unknown Soldier 04-18-2007 02:07 PM

100nl JJ pf decision, meh
 
Party Poker
No Limit Hold'em Cash Game
$0.50/$1 Blinds
6 Players
LegoPoker HH Converter

SB: $25.80
BB: $84.30
<font color="black">US (UTG): $99.50</font>
MP: $21.67
<font color="black">CO: $9.45</font>
<font color="black">BTN: $151.80</font>

<font color="black">Preflop:</font> US is dealt J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (6 Players)
US raises to $4, MP folds, CO raises all-in to $9.45, BTN raises to $16, 2 folds, US?


guy was 12/12 (25) so pretty readless.

MasterLJ 04-18-2007 02:11 PM

Re: 100nl JJ pf decision, meh
 
Folding is perfectly fine. So is playing JJ for set value.

OHFreak 04-18-2007 02:13 PM

Re: 100nl JJ pf decision, meh
 
Playin' for set value w/100BB and 16BB in the pot?

I probably fold but I'm not a big fan o' variance.

TwistedEcho 04-18-2007 02:15 PM

Re: 100nl JJ pf decision, meh
 
Call, people bluff less in pots with a sidebet because they are dumb, and should make it obvious if you are good.

MasterLJ 04-18-2007 02:17 PM

Re: 100nl JJ pf decision, meh
 
[ QUOTE ]
Playin' for set value w/100BB and 16BB in the pot?

I probably fold but I'm not a big fan o' variance.

[/ QUOTE ]

You only have to call 4BB (you are using PTBB right?) and you are only committing 1/12th your stack. You have a lot of room to make the implied odds work.

Unknown Soldier 04-18-2007 02:22 PM

Re: 100nl JJ pf decision, meh
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Playin' for set value w/100BB and 16BB in the pot?

I probably fold but I'm not a big fan o' variance.

[/ QUOTE ]

You only have to call 4BB (you are using PTBB right?) and you are only committing 1/12th your stack. You have a lot of room to make the implied odds work.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

it's 12 to me; 12bbs i have 100

OHFreak 04-18-2007 02:29 PM

Re: 100nl JJ pf decision, meh
 
Right... you'll have put in $16 total PF w/the possibility to win a max of $110.45? Not enough room for me to play for set value.

TheChad 04-18-2007 02:35 PM

Re: 100nl JJ pf decision, meh
 
if you think you have the original allin beat, call it. Without knowing much about the isolator, I would call and see if an over hits. I'd almost bet money that he's just trying to score a couple of BBs with a crappy ace. And I'd bet he thinks the same of you.

Shot in the dark.

Some9 04-18-2007 02:41 PM

Re: 100nl JJ pf decision, meh
 
I just learned to fold in those spots, because its a bad reverse implied odds situation. Even if you are ahead (AK) and bet a ragged flop you will lose on average.

And you will et to see his hand which is valueable info, so accroding you can take a note.

TwistedEcho 04-18-2007 02:52 PM

Re: 100nl JJ pf decision, meh
 
[ QUOTE ]
I just learned to fold in those spots, because its a bad reverse implied odds situation.

[/ QUOTE ]

..... Call, flop set, stack AA-QQ. Not reverse implied odds at all.

Anyway, when he has missed overs and the flop comes T53 he will cbet here MUCH LESS since there is someone allin and people treat it like a tournament and check it down. So when it comes 9/Thi and it goes check check you can bet blank turns, when it comes Thi and he cbets you can just fold.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.