Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   STT Strategy (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   16s: probably easy question (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=357057)

Jshuttlesworth 03-16-2007 11:13 PM

16s: probably easy question
 
I used to shove this [censored] all day long but now that i actually examine it, it seems like an EZ fold. What say you STTF?

PokerStars Tournament, Big Blind is t400 with t25 antes (4 handed) Converter on pregopoker.com

Hero (t2155)
Button (t4470)
SB (t2000)
BB (t4875)

Preflop: Hero is in CO with 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

HERO???

DevinLake 03-16-2007 11:15 PM

Re: 16s: probably easy question
 
Depends on reads. What are they calling with? How's the button been using that 2nd stack? How well has other shorty been playing? how loose is BB?

Jshuttlesworth 03-16-2007 11:31 PM

Re: 16s: probably easy question
 
[ QUOTE ]
Depends on reads. What are they calling with? How's the button been using that 2nd stack? How well has other shorty been playing? how loose is BB?

[/ QUOTE ]

ummmm.... 16 tabling... but i guess a push isn't awful!

doubLe a tom 03-16-2007 11:33 PM

Re: 16s: probably easy question
 
Its a toss up. I probably push 60-70% and fold 30-40%.

DevinLake 03-16-2007 11:40 PM

Re: 16s: probably easy question
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Depends on reads. What are they calling with? How's the button been using that 2nd stack? How well has other shorty been playing? how loose is BB?

[/ QUOTE ]

ummmm.... 16 tabling... but i guess a push isn't awful!

[/ QUOTE ]

sigh...

doubLe a tom 03-16-2007 11:43 PM

Re: 16s: probably easy question
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Depends on reads. What are they calling with? How's the button been using that 2nd stack? How well has other shorty been playing? how loose is BB?

[/ QUOTE ]

ummmm.... 16 tabling... but i guess a push isn't awful!

[/ QUOTE ]

sigh...

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, only 16 tables... [censored] weak

Bryn 03-17-2007 06:59 PM

Re: 16s: probably easy question
 
I think a push a resonable, depending on reads. If the other players understand ICM I like a push more. If BB calls us loose so be it, were favorite to double up and have the big stack on the bubble. TBH In game i'd push, just cos we can't let SB steal the blinds and overtake us.

Dr_Wonderful 03-18-2007 12:27 AM

Re: 16s: probably easy question
 
[ QUOTE ]
I think a push a resonable, depending on reads. If the other players understand ICM I like a push more. If BB calls us loose so be it, were favorite to double up and have the big stack on the bubble. TBH In game i'd push, just cos we can't let SB steal the blinds and overtake us.

[/ QUOTE ]

Players at the 16s do not understand ICM. I'm a 16 player that does quite well and don't understand ICM. Either way, I push this all day long. You've got 5 BBs in your stack and those 600 chips would taste like pie if you were to win them. Any ace is a push here IMO.

AMT 03-18-2007 01:34 AM

Re: 16s: probably easy question
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Depends on reads. What are they calling with? How's the button been using that 2nd stack? How well has other shorty been playing? how loose is BB?

[/ QUOTE ]

ummmm.... 16 tabling... but i guess a push isn't awful!

[/ QUOTE ]

sigh...

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, only 16 tables... [censored] weak

[/ QUOTE ]


pretty sure he meant it the other way around [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

JROK777 03-18-2007 03:56 AM

Re: 16s: probably easy question
 
Auto-shove


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.