nl50: KQs with a repeat c/r\'er
 

2d time he's done this to me. Villain runs 30/11/2. I was running 18/12/2.3 and probably c/betting about 50% of the time, not really a ton.


Full Tilt Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.25/$0.50
5 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $43.35
CO: $51.10
Hero: $54.95
SB: $70.40
BB: $51.25

Pre-flop: (5 players) Hero is Button with Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
UTG folds, CO calls, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $3</font>, 2 folds, CO calls.

Flop: Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($6.75, 2 players)
CO checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $4</font>, <font color="#cc0000">CO raises to $12</font>,
<font color="blue"> Hero ? </font>

Re: nl50: KQs with a repeat c/r\'er
 

call &amp; evaluate turn

Re: nl50: KQs with a repeat c/r\'er
 

Unless he's really tricky, the only likely hand that beats you is a set. Do you remember whether the board was similarly dry and non-threatening the first time he c/r you? If so, I'm skeptical that he flopped a set twice....

The second time he does this, I probably call and re-evaluate turn. Likely folding to a big turn bet, I guess, not that I like it....

Re: nl50: KQs with a repeat c/r\'er
 

[ QUOTE ]
I was running 18/12/2.3 and probably c/betting about 50% of the time, not really a ton.

[/ QUOTE ]

You nit. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Calling here is best imo, and precisely the reason why you're consistently c-betting.

Re: nl50: KQs with a repeat c/r\'er
 

Its really difficult to make any judgements about someone who has done something to you one other time.

If it didn't go to showdown, we can make even LESS judgements about it.

Re: nl50: KQs with a repeat c/r\'er
 

[ QUOTE ]
Unless he's really tricky, the only likely hand that beats you is a set. Do you remember whether the board was similarly dry and non-threatening the first time he c/r you? If so, I'm skeptical that he flopped a set twice....

The second time he does this, I probably call and re-evaluate turn. Likely folding to a big turn bet, I guess, not that I like it....

[/ QUOTE ]

67
AQ

Those aren't likely?

Re: nl50: KQs with a repeat c/r\'er
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Unless he's really tricky, the only likely hand that beats you is a set. Do you remember whether the board was similarly dry and non-threatening the first time he c/r you? If so, I'm skeptical that he flopped a set twice....

The second time he does this, I probably call and re-evaluate turn. Likely folding to a big turn bet, I guess, not that I like it....

[/ QUOTE ]

67
AQ

Those aren't likely?

[/ QUOTE ]

55
88
A7
QJ

Those aren't likely?

Re: nl50: KQs with a repeat c/r\'er
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Unless he's really tricky, the only likely hand that beats you is a set. Do you remember whether the board was similarly dry and non-threatening the first time he c/r you? If so, I'm skeptical that he flopped a set twice....

The second time he does this, I probably call and re-evaluate turn. Likely folding to a big turn bet, I guess, not that I like it....

[/ QUOTE ]

67
AQ

Those aren't likely?

[/ QUOTE ]

67 is definitely likely.
AQ is possible, but not exactly the first that springs to mind.

Re: nl50: KQs with a repeat c/r\'er
 

[ QUOTE ]
Its really difficult to make any judgements about someone who has done something to you one other time.

If it didn't go to showdown, we can make even LESS judgements about it.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, but didn't make a "judgement" about it, its more of a fact. What it means either way, I dunno.

Re: nl50: KQs with a repeat c/r\'er
 

Definitely call this. I'm really not afraid to felt this tbh. He has a set here a lot less than he has some trashy tp hand, draw or mid-pair.