Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   STT Strategy (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   $22s - Simple PF question. 99 after a limper with 19xBBs. (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=278299)

K䲰䮥n 12-08-2006 10:11 AM

$22s - Simple PF question. 99 after a limper with 19xBBs.
 
Limper is passive 30/2 in this tourney. I'm sorry for the lack of converter. Maybe that STT coder guy could make up a working converter for Party? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Blinds(50/100)

Seat 10 is the button
Total number of players : 8
Seat 6: DerMue41 ( 1880 )
Seat 7: altinlala ( 1540 )
Seat 9: Hero ( 1890 )
Seat 10: yakovlev3 ( 2570 )
Seat 1: lexumy ( 4130 )
Seat 4: DRQueens ( 4170 )
Seat 5: Peromann ( 1970 )
Seat 3: nikev ( 1850 )
Trny: 30683556 Level: 3

Dealt to Hero [ 9s 9h ]
DRQueens folds
Peromann folds
DerMue41 folds
altinlala calls [100]

Hero ?

Unknown Soldier 12-08-2006 10:12 AM

Re: $22s - Simple PF question. 99 after a limper with 19xBBs.
 
I call

K䲰䮥n 12-08-2006 10:16 AM

Re: $22s - Simple PF question. 99 after a limper with 19xBBs.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I call

[/ QUOTE ]

Even of the question was simple the answers dont have to be [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] What's your reasoning?

HesseJam 12-08-2006 10:17 AM

Re: $22s - Simple PF question. 99 after a limper with 19xBBs.
 
Because of the inherent threat of a reraise behind you it seems too thin to just call and play for set value.

I dunno, if you think that a raise to 250 will shut down the field behind you this would be a better option. Also, this move would gain extra strength if villain has a low flop aggression and is capable laying down to your c-b if he missed.

Unknown Soldier 12-08-2006 10:19 AM

Re: $22s - Simple PF question. 99 after a limper with 19xBBs.
 
oh sorry, just though you wanted a quick answer. Well I'm calling for set value its 1/19th of your stack, there are also a few flops where you have overs. I dont like raising here because of the limper and any cbetting after the flop will make him pretty much pot-comitted. So that has too much risk imo. Folding is too weak 99 is a strong hand + you hve position

K䲰䮥n 12-08-2006 10:19 AM

Re: $22s - Simple PF question. 99 after a limper with 19xBBs.
 
I might be very wrong here but shouldnt we/villain have atleast 20xBBs to call for set value?

I'm always lost with this...

Unknown Soldier 12-08-2006 10:20 AM

Re: $22s - Simple PF question. 99 after a limper with 19xBBs.
 
yeah but 99 has more then set value to it, you could flop an overpair. I think I'm folding 88 here.

K䲰䮥n 12-08-2006 10:22 AM

Re: $22s - Simple PF question. 99 after a limper with 19xBBs.
 
how about TT?

Unknown Soldier 12-08-2006 10:23 AM

Re: $22s - Simple PF question. 99 after a limper with 19xBBs.
 
same as 99 for me. JJ I'm raising. Dont know what everyone thinks about that?

K䲰䮥n 12-08-2006 10:26 AM

Re: $22s - Simple PF question. 99 after a limper with 19xBBs.
 
[ QUOTE ]
JJ I'm raising.

[/ QUOTE ]

I posted a similar JJ hand yesterday and most people agreed it to be a raise to t350 in this spot.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.