Call-reraising all-in with overpair.
 

This is a UB hand history and every hand history converter I know of can't handle UB so here goes...

Hand #xxxxxxxxxx at Columbia (No Limit Hold'em)
Started at 29/Nov/06 00:28:50

x is at seat 0 with $143.65.
x is at seat 1 with $140.25.
<u>Hero is teh shiznit with $210.70.</u>
<u>Villain 1 is at seat 3 with $104.95.</u>
x is at seat 4 with $55.55.
<u>Villain 2 is at seat 5 with $28.65.</u>
The button is at seat 4.

Villain 2 posts the small blind of $.50.
x posts the big blind of $1.

x: -- --
x: -- --
Hero: T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
Villain 1: -- --
x: -- --
Villain 2: -- --

Pre-flop:

x calls. Hero raises to $4.50. Villain 1 calls. x folds. Villain 2 calls. x folds. RAHZero calls.

Flop (board: 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]):

Villain 2 goes all-in for $24.15. x folds. Hero calls. Villain 1 raises to $49. Hero says "gotcha" and raises to $190.15...

My plan from the moment the shortie went all in was to see a showdown with him. I wanted to give the richer villain a chance to push me off the hand by showing weakness. So I just called, and when he bet big I did what any sane man would do. I pushed. Likey?

Re: Call-reraising all-in with overpair.
 

I'd raise on the flop instead of flat calling.

Re: Call-reraising all-in with overpair.
 

Why? To isolate the all-in with my overpair? I don't think call-reraising is too fancy...

Re: Call-reraising all-in with overpair.
 

I would probably fold the flop the 2nd time around.

Re: Call-reraising all-in with overpair.
 

I don't think your hand is good often enough to make this a good play. Also, I don't think you fold out any better hands. Without a read on villain, calling the first time and folding the second seems reasonable.

Re: Call-reraising all-in with overpair.
 

Looks very horrible.