Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Other Gambling Games (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=33)
-   -   BG books for beginners (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=236804)

Tony.T 10-15-2006 05:29 AM

BG books for beginners
 
Best first read for a hobby player who want to improve his/her game?

Robertie 10-16-2006 09:01 AM

Re: BG books for beginners
 
Try "Backgammon for Winners", available on Amazon. "Backgammon for Serious Players" is a good followup.

GrahamW 10-18-2006 12:09 PM

Re: BG books for beginners
 
I think some of the advice is a bit dated, but Backgammon: The Cruelest Game was a really good read for me.

BGGGPG 10-20-2006 11:43 PM

Re: BG books for beginners
 
Best books for beginners are those mentioned by Robertie as well as "Backgammon" by Paul Magriel and "Backgammon Boot Camp" by Walter Trice.

Robertie 10-21-2006 09:03 AM

Re: BG books for beginners
 
The Cruelest Game is a real paradox, (as Barclay himself might say). It's probably the most entertaining book ever written on backgammon, as Barclay Cooke was an excellent writer and really loved his subject. No other book is as likely to get you so interested in the game itself.

Unfortunately, the advice in the book is awful, and his follow-up, "Paradoxes and Probabilities" is even worse. If you absorb these books and his theories, you're going to have to spend a long time relearning the game at some later date. Save yourself some misery and learn the game from good books.

Edenfield99 10-25-2006 09:56 AM

Re: BG books for beginners
 
Robertie - I've read Paradoxies and Probabilites, can you explain to me why it is so bad? I've seen some web sites actually reccomend the book as essential reading. I need to know what I need to unlearn!!

Skipbidder 10-25-2006 10:50 PM

Re: BG books for beginners
 
[ QUOTE ]
If you absorb these books and his theories, you're going to have to spend a long time relearning the game at some later date.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nonsense. I learned from Bruce Becker's Backgammon for Blood. I suffer no ill effects. (Well, except for the searing pain I feel in my head from the deconditioning therapy necessary to stop me from playing all my opening sixes from the midpoint. That and the 4.3 squazillion dollars I lost to opponents who realize that you don't have to keep hitting blots and helping out my backgame timing.)

Robertie 10-26-2006 09:26 AM

Re: BG books for beginners
 
OK, here goes.

"Paradoxes and Probabilities" was based on an erroneous conception of backgammon. The game is fundamentally a race, with a lot of fascinating positional overtones. Cooke thought the game was fundamentally a positional struggle, with racing overtones. In his problems, he's constantly advocating the sacrifice of racing equity to build priming structures. He's sometimes correct, but more often wrong, and a lot of his mistakes are really serious blunders.

Slotting a point to make a better blocking formation is actually a dangerous play which has to be considered very carefully. To be correct, a slot has to be based on more than just the potential value of the slotted point. The point must be both valuable and unlikely to be made in the normal course of events. Often a correct slot also involves unstacking a heavily stacked point. If your position is not stacked but is reasonably flexible, slots are likely to be wrong because your position will improve itself naturally, without risk.

There are plenty of positions where slotting, or some other apparently risky maneuver, is completely correct. But Cooke can't distinguish between the two. In a nutshell, he just took too much risk for the potential rewards.

You can try to play in Cooke's style if you wish, but against competent opponents, what will happen is that you will be forced into various sorts of holding games and lose lots of races. Once in a while, of course, your fancy plays will work and you'll look like a genius. But not often enough.

By the way, in the early 1970s, a lot of top players played in Cooke's style and were very successful. (Which is why the books were written.) But they succeeded because most of their opponents were complete beginners who had no idea how to use the cube, not because of their super-aggressive play. A more modern approach to using the checkers would have won even more easily.

Edenfield99 10-26-2006 11:36 AM

Re: BG books for beginners
 
Thanks for the critique, I will reread it but with your points in mind to help me 'unlearn'.

I've been playing for about 2 years, I started with "Backgammon for Winners" and then "Backgammon for Serious Players" and then assorted other books without much of a plan. I had laid out a plan for improving my game which was to read the following books (I've read some before) in this order while continuing to play, study annotated games etc. Any comments on what's missing and what's not there that should be.....

Backgammon - Paul Magriel
Backgammon Boot Camp - Walter Trice
Backgammon for Profit - Joe Dwek
501 Essential Backgammon Problems - Bill Robertie
Advanced Backgammon Vol 1 & 2 - Bill Robertie
New Ideas In Backgammon - Kit Woolsey & Hal Heinrich
Modern Backgammon - Bill Robertie

Obviously this is a plan for the next few years, not an overnight thing!

Robertie 10-26-2006 05:21 PM

Re: BG books for beginners
 
It's an excellent list, but "Modern BG" should be closer to first than last.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.