Best $10/20 PL players at Party?
 

Any 2+2ers regulars in this game?

I've just started playing o/8 again a few days ago, so I can't tell who the good players at this level are yet.

Re: Best $10/20 PL players at Party?
 

Played HakAllah yet? *snicker*

Re: Best $10/20 PL players at Party?
 

You "just started" playing O/8 but you're playing the $2000 game?

Re: Best $10/20 PL players at Party?
 

[ QUOTE ]
playing o/8 again

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think he is a newb.

Re: Best $10/20 PL players at Party?
 

[ QUOTE ]
You "just started" playing O/8 but you're playing the $2000 game?

[/ QUOTE ]No, I've played it a lot in the past, but I havn't played it in about 8 months because I took a long brake to really work on my NLHE ring game skills and then I took off 1.5 months for the WSOP. Needless to say, I'm confident in my skills to beat the game.

Re: Best $10/20 PL players at Party?
 

[ QUOTE ]
...I havn't played it in about 8 months because I took a long brake to really work on my spelling

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

Re: Best $10/20 PL players at Party?
 

You really should post more. Your name alone inspires awe every time I read it.

As for the OP:

- HakAllah: he datamines relentlessly and has your entire play history available to him, be aware of how he'll use this, and adjust. Strong game but something of a rote player, plays quite exploitable lines.

- DonaldKey: Solid, solid dude, plays close to optimal lines. Don't mess with him.

- GASS_U: The Daddy. Nuff said.

- MAHA88 - Don't be fooled by the female avatar.

Hope that helps.

Re: Best $10/20 PL players at Party?
 

All 4 are good winning players, but all 4 have significant exploitable leaks.

Re: Best $10/20 PL players at Party?
 

Have definitely played with MahA88.....not sure about the other 3 off the top of my head.

Re: Best $10/20 PL players at Party?
 

[ QUOTE ]
DonaldKey: Solid, solid dude, plays close to optimal lines. Don't mess with him.

[/ QUOTE ]

You sure about this? I have done very well against him in the $200 and $400 games. Seems to be a higher limit version of you, now that I think of it, maybe that explains the results.