Constitutional Amendment
Ignore for a moment whether you favor gay marriage or not. Ignore whether you think there are a band of runaway judges just trying to ram gay marriage down your throat (I love that imagery, by the way.)
Is this really something that should be a constitutional amendment? Should the Constitution be Amended to create Super-legislation, or should a Constitutional Amendment be more than that? |
Re: Constitutional Amendment
If its for the "general welfare" then it seems as though legislators can and "should" do anything they feel, right?
|
Re: Constitutional Amendment
Still waiting for the "everyone gets a pony" amendment.
|
Re: Constitutional Amendment
No. I know almost nothing about the law but what "trendy" issue would be next? I assume this is just placating the base.
|
Re: Constitutional Amendment
You know what would be better? If, instead of worrying about amending the constitution, legislators followed it. I say this as a Brit looking in at your whole political process, thinking WTF happened to half the stuff in the original document.
|
Re: Constitutional Amendment
I don't think there should be any rules as to what should or should not be a valid topic for a Constitutional Amendment. The process is designed to make it hard for politcal whim to prevail, and we have history that shows a bad amendment can be undone.
Let the process do the talking. |
Re: Constitutional Amendment
[ QUOTE ]
You know what would be better? If, instead of worrying about amending the constitution, legislators followed it. I say this as a Brit looking in at your whole political process, thinking WTF happened to half the stuff in the original document. [/ QUOTE ] What about the stuff that, you know, wasn't addressed in the document when it was originally written? |
Re: Constitutional Amendment
[ QUOTE ]
What about the stuff that, you know, wasn't addressed in the document when it was originally written? [/ QUOTE ] Like whether gays should be married or flags burned or alcohol consumed. |
Re: Constitutional Amendment
The definition of marriage should be consistent accross all the states, and is something that should not change at a political whim. I think an admendment is necessary.
Stu |
Re: Constitutional Amendment
[ QUOTE ]
You know what would be better? If, instead of worrying about amending the constitution, legislators followed it. ... WTF happened to half the stuff in the original document. [/ QUOTE ] I could not agree more. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.