H@££INGGOL and twin-caracas
 

AIM conversation from 5 minutes ago, actual AIM aliases changed:

(10:54:46 AM) H@££INGGOL: u read about me and twin not bettin each other?
(10:54:50 AM) N 82 50 24: yea
(10:55:19 AM) H@££INGGOL: well we back on full attack now would you mind posting something about it so people know
(10:55:26 AM) H@££INGGOL: ?
(10:55:32 AM) N 82 50 24: okay, i'll post about it
(10:55:36 AM) H@££INGGOL: ty

Just so everyone knows, the soft-playing between the two of them is over. Not sure if anyone here cares, but some people seemed upset about it when it was made public.

Re: H@££INGGOL and twin-caracas
 

Multi-accounting is the new softplaying.

Re: H@££INGGOL and twin-caracas
 

[ QUOTE ]

(10:55:19 AM) H@££INGGOL: well we back on full attack now would you mind posting something about it so people know


[/ QUOTE ]

this will surely relieve people's suspicions about some kind of collusion going on.

Re: H@££INGGOL and twin-caracas
 

I'm still disgusted that they actually did that.

Re: H@££INGGOL and twin-caracas
 

[ QUOTE ]
I'm still disgusted that they actually did that.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: H@££INGGOL and twin-caracas
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm still disgusted that they actually did that.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: H@££INGGOL and twin-caracas
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm still disgusted that they actually did that.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: H@££INGGOL and twin-caracas
 

[ QUOTE ]

(10:54:50 AM) N 82 50 24: yea


[/ QUOTE ]

Re: H@££INGGOL and twin-caracas
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

(10:54:50 AM) N 82 50 24: yea


[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Why are you quoting that?

He asked me if I'd read about it, and I said yes... this was news on a few forums for awhile, so naturally I had read about it.

Re: H@££INGGOL and twin-caracas
 

I read in NVG something to the effect of H@LL "called it off without tilling twin," tilted twin, so he dumped a few stacks. Ask him if thats true, I hope it is.