Re: Inappropriate Avatar?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Changing Clayton's title would be [censored] ridic. Removing everything that just might offend somebody is slipperly slope the ends up with Nick's joke being reality.

[/ QUOTE ]

Removing everything that might offend an advertiser is wise however. 2+2 is a business after all, and as they grow and attempt to attract larger brands besides the online type for sponsorship and ad revenue then this will become a much bigger issue.

Re: Inappropriate Avatar?
 

[ QUOTE ]
The term evanal would also be banned.

[/ QUOTE ]

the one, the only, the origional Evanal. Modeled by Tank.

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y14.../photo_023.jpg

Re: Inappropriate Avatar?
 

[ QUOTE ]
For the next update, could we get rid of display names and avatars. We could identify ourselves by member number. We would have to get rid of the 4's because it would offend our chinese members, and get rid of 13s cause that is unlucky. We could also get rid of all these poker terms that are highly offensive, such as donk or fish. Everybody would have to learn seat positions for hand histories. Hijack position wouldn't be allowed since that sounds too much like a terrorist. They could also use hero and not hero. Villian is too offensive, so that would be banned too.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with Nick B.

Re: Inappropriate Avatar?
 

I agree with Private Joker in that we should rid ourselves of the Raptor Christ character. Good find sir.

Re: Inappropriate Avatar?
 

I'm glad that at last we are gelling as a team, accepting each other's foibles as our own, and moving forward with a common goal.

I blame Sniper for what went before.