Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   100 NL: JJ hand #2 (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=555611)

fatman20 11-27-2007 02:41 PM

100 NL: JJ hand #2
 
Villain is 16/11/4/1659 hands. What is the best play pre-flop considering villains stats? Do we smooth call and hope to hit a Jack or do we 3-bet?

What do we do on this flop? Do we call a bet, raise a bet, lead out if checked to? What if he raises us, do we go all the way with our hand?


Full Tilt Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.50/$1
5 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $250.95
CO: $118.70
Button: $299.85
SB: $74.70
Hero: $134.50

Pre-flop: (5 players) Hero is BB with J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
<font color="#cc0000">UTG raises to $3.5</font>, 3 folds, Hero calls.

Flop: 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($7.5, 2 players)



edit: I'm an idiot. Had the wrong hand.

Paul Thomson 11-27-2007 02:43 PM

Re: 100 NL: JJ hand #2
 
Villain seemse aggressive. i like your 3-bet preflop. i'd just check behind on the flop although i think u could get a call from a weaker pair. but i also think the villain will check-raise alot with AK and what not and i don't want to be put in that position.

Suigin406 11-27-2007 02:45 PM

Re: 100 NL: JJ hand #2
 
raise a little bit more PF, meh, bvb, i think he would repop u with a big pair because ur 3bet was kinda small, but who knows...

we have position, what did he do?? do not check behind here, bet

Paul Thomson 11-27-2007 02:48 PM

Re: 100 NL: JJ hand #2
 
[ QUOTE ]
raise a little bit more PF, meh, bvb, i think he would repop u with a big pair because ur 3bet was kinda small, but who knows...

we have position, what did he do?? do not check behind here, bet

[/ QUOTE ]

why do u want to bet the flop? i think a smaller pocket pair will call. but they also might call a turn bet.

Suigin406 11-27-2007 02:51 PM

Re: 100 NL: JJ hand #2
 
eerrr?? y would we give free cards, we want to get value from the weaker pairs and possibly from overcards...

definitely bet flop if checked to

early325 11-27-2007 02:57 PM

Re: 100 NL: JJ hand #2
 
Paul,

i generally agree w/ your posts, but checking behind on this flop seems bad.

Paul Thomson 11-27-2007 02:57 PM

Re: 100 NL: JJ hand #2
 
[ QUOTE ]
eerrr?? y would we give free cards, we want to get value from the weaker pairs and possibly from overcards...

definitely bet flop if checked to

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm not so worried about giving free cards to underpairs. do u think villain is aggressive enough to check-raise with over-cards. his aggro stat is real high. i use this line alot.

fatman20 11-27-2007 03:00 PM

Re: 100 NL: JJ hand #2
 
I had the JJ hand posted. Please take another look at the op and let me know what you think

early325 11-27-2007 03:03 PM

Re: 100 NL: JJ hand #2
 
oh, c/r a lot, b/3b sometimes

shpanko 11-27-2007 04:13 PM

Re: 100 NL: JJ hand #2
 
eh, c/c or c/r seems fine. I generally c/c


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.