Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Medium Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   400NL 99 facing C/R (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=556882)

Unknown Soldier 11-29-2007 11:52 AM

Re: 400NL 99 facing C/R
 
folding AA here. LOL

Mr_Moore 11-29-2007 12:23 PM

Re: 400NL 99 facing C/R
 
[ QUOTE ]
folding AA here. LOL

[/ QUOTE ]

xwowsersx 11-29-2007 12:47 PM

Re: 400NL 99 facing C/R
 
[ QUOTE ]
wtf at folding AA 110bb deep... COME ON

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm going to have to agree with slider here regarding AA. I'm not sure that felting is a certainty, but at least calling the check raise and evaluating on the turn, especially being in position. Theres no doubt that a lot of his range includes TT+ and possibly draws, though I'm fairly confident, given his PF play, that he wouldn't call an UTG raise with small suited connectors. But, like Slider said, you cannot just immediately narrow a villains range to exactly a set just because he check raises you on this flop.
Truthfully, the fact that the flop is all low cards, makes him holding an overpair even more likely. Many would take his line with 99+ on this flop.

easycall 11-29-2007 12:59 PM

Re: 400NL 99 facing C/R
 
[ QUOTE ]
folding AA here. LOL

[/ QUOTE ]

ata 11-29-2007 02:03 PM

Re: 400NL 99 facing C/R
 
Why has this turned into what you'd do with AA? Obv no one is folding it.

Given his stats, I'd strong imagine he has either 7xs or a broadway FD. I'd expect him to repop AA-QQ pf. Sure sometimes he'll show up with an overpair to your 99 or with a set, but I'm getting it in.

gir 11-29-2007 03:30 PM

Re: 400NL 99 facing C/R
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
folding AA here. LOL

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know who got the impression that folding AA was right here, but clearly, you aren't reading. I'm wrong, 99 DNE AA. I also stated that I would not fold AA. I contradicted myself and you're only taking one half of the argument...And it was the half that made little sense (my thoughts cleared up later in the post).

HustlerLA 11-29-2007 06:21 PM

Re: 400NL 99 facing C/R
 
I would fold the AA but call the 99 since they are not equal, Does that clear things up?

Choparno 11-29-2007 08:01 PM

Re: 400NL 99 facing C/R
 
Players with an AF that low are generally pretty weak. I think 99 is a fairly straightforward fold here. While this might be a pure bluff very occasionally, huge majority of the time this is going to be a set or a hand that has 14 outs against you.

RockyElsom 11-29-2007 08:10 PM

Re: 400NL 99 facing C/R
 
Anyone who folds AA here sucks.

Anyone who doesn't think calling is an option plays too much fit or fold poker.

xwowsersx 11-29-2007 08:28 PM

Re: 400NL 99 facing C/R
 
[ QUOTE ]
Why has this turned into what you'd do with AA? Obv no one is folding it.

Given his stats, I'd strong imagine he has either 7xs or a broadway FD. I'd expect him to repop AA-QQ pf. Sure sometimes he'll show up with an overpair to your 99 or with a set, but I'm getting it in.

[/ QUOTE ]

As always, I really appreciate the feedback. I think my hand might have some showdown value, but I disagree with feeling too confident about getting it in here. I think his range for cold calling an UTG raise means that he usually has an overpair, set, or broadway flush. So I'm not really much of a favorite against villains check raising range on this flop. If there were more draws I'd be more inclined to get it in.

Anyone interested in results?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.