Re: out of action person bets, angleshoot????
 

Angles have to be a bit sketchier than that.

It's only an angle if the hero deliberately induces or somehow "tricks" OOT player to trigger action.

FWIW, Borgata already forces the raise. Not sure why the Foxwoods floor said a raise wouldn't be "legal" since it still a raise of the original bet. Poor choice of word.

Re: out of action person bets, angleshoot????
 

[ QUOTE ]

Not sure why the Foxwoods floor said a raise wouldn't be "legal" since it still a raise of the original bet. Poor choice of word.

[/ QUOTE ]

they said because its not the loose players action that his raise is meaningless. him announcing anything fold, raise, call, doesnt stand because the action isnt on him yet.


like the obove poster said its not really an angle because its the same as looking at the guy behind and noticing something he would normally do when he gets ready to raise when its his action.

my thoughts when i saw the hand was damn im def just calling in this guys spot so the loose guy raises behind, the tight player calls (if tight guy has a hand) then i can put my raise in and pick up an extra 40$. thought it might be kind of an angle but wanted to see if anyone thought of that to be unethical.

Re: out of action person bets, angleshoot????
 

nah, only if you induce him to act out of turn.