Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Student Life (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=69)
-   -   Microeconomics Question (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=551460)

philnewall 11-21-2007 01:35 PM

Microeconomics Question
 
http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i1...fall/econ1.jpg

I'm really stuck on this question does anyone know the answer? Cheers guys.

tabako 11-21-2007 02:44 PM

Re: Microeconomics Question
 
If you just write the lemma twice (once for p_i and once for p_j) and then take the partial of each of those with respect to p (subscript the other variable), don't you just get that d2e/(dp_j * dp_i) = dh*_i/dp_j and d2e/(dp_i * dp_j) = dh*_j/dp_i

Thats hard to read but basically I think what you get after you partial the Lemma is that the Left Hand Side equals one of the sides of Young's Theorem, and the the Right Hand Side is half of the equation you want to prove holds. Do this twice for each of i,j and you should get that the equation holds.

ncray 11-21-2007 03:00 PM

Re: Microeconomics Question
 
Yeah, tabako's right. Maybe to be a little bit more clear,
d^2e / (dp_i*dp_j) = d/dp_i * de/dp_j = d/dp_i * h*_j = dh*_j / dp_i
And since d^2e / (dp_i*dp_j) = d^2e / (dp_j*dp_i) = d/dp_j * de/dp_i = d/dp_j * h*_i = dh*_i / dp_j

We have that dh*_j / dp_i = dh*_i / dp_j

philnewall 11-21-2007 03:21 PM

Re: Microeconomics Question
 
Thanks a lot!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.