Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Shorthanded (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   ***Official Stars Regs Thread*** (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=373096)

elffaw 04-06-2007 12:10 AM

Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
 
DullSetSound, don't play any more [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

nickg1532 04-06-2007 12:13 AM

Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
 
[ QUOTE ]
DullSetSound, don't play any more [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

i think i remember you. did you have a chick in your avatar?

elffaw 04-06-2007 12:17 AM

Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
 
yep. blue hair

chezlaw 04-06-2007 12:21 AM

Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
21/16 and I've loosened up a bit [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

cardlogs32 seems very decent and I notice he is 21/16 as well.

chez

[/ QUOTE ]

What limit is this? 21/16 is very tight. If it's like 5/10, I'd have serious doubts about that being a winning style. Certainly not optimal IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]
Limits 3/6 to 10/20, mainly 5/10
I believe you're wrong about it not being a winning style but right about it not being optimal.

I'm trying to loosen up but if that fails I'll dedicate the rest of the year to being tilt free and proving you wrong [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

chez

Leader 04-06-2007 01:01 AM

Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
21/16 and I've loosened up a bit [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

cardlogs32 seems very decent and I notice he is 21/16 as well.

chez

[/ QUOTE ]

What limit is this? 21/16 is very tight. If it's like 5/10, I'd have serious doubts about that being a winning style. Certainly not optimal IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]
Limits 3/6 to 10/20, mainly 5/10
I believe you're wrong about it not being a winning style but right about it not being optimal.

I'm trying to loosen up but if that fails I'll dedicate the rest of the year to being tilt free and proving you wrong [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

chez

[/ QUOTE ]

Well I guess I shouldn't say it's a losing style. You can win with it. Most of the people with those type stats in my big FT database, 1.5m hands, are losing and over all the group has a loss rate of .5BB/100.

chezlaw 04-06-2007 01:27 AM

Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
21/16 and I've loosened up a bit [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

cardlogs32 seems very decent and I notice he is 21/16 as well.

chez

[/ QUOTE ]

What limit is this? 21/16 is very tight. If it's like 5/10, I'd have serious doubts about that being a winning style. Certainly not optimal IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]
Limits 3/6 to 10/20, mainly 5/10
I believe you're wrong about it not being a winning style but right about it not being optimal.

I'm trying to loosen up but if that fails I'll dedicate the rest of the year to being tilt free and proving you wrong [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

chez

[/ QUOTE ]

Well I guess I shouldn't say it's a losing style. You can win with it. Most of the people with those type stats in my big FT database, 1.5m hands, are losing and over all the group has a loss rate of .5BB/100.

[/ QUOTE ]
How does that compare to 30/20?

chez

vmacosta 04-06-2007 01:30 AM

Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
 
Chez, cardlogs and others:
Having v tight pf stats is +ev cuz it makes me try to take you off your blind and tilt when I can't.

MacGuyV 04-06-2007 01:31 AM

Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
 
Cardlogs is never not playing. On the whole he knows what he's doing obv. He uses wa/wb in some weird spots though imo.

Leader 04-06-2007 01:36 AM

Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
21/16 and I've loosened up a bit [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

cardlogs32 seems very decent and I notice he is 21/16 as well.

chez

[/ QUOTE ]

What limit is this? 21/16 is very tight. If it's like 5/10, I'd have serious doubts about that being a winning style. Certainly not optimal IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]
Limits 3/6 to 10/20, mainly 5/10
I believe you're wrong about it not being a winning style but right about it not being optimal.

I'm trying to loosen up but if that fails I'll dedicate the rest of the year to being tilt free and proving you wrong [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

chez

[/ QUOTE ]

Well I guess I shouldn't say it's a losing style. You can win with it. Most of the people with those type stats in my big FT database, 1.5m hands, are losing and over all the group has a loss rate of .5BB/100.

[/ QUOTE ]
How does that compare to 30/20?

chez

[/ QUOTE ]

Edit: I'll open the database and post the numbers exactly.

Leader 04-06-2007 01:59 AM

Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
 
meh I have a bad memory.

Filtered for 4-6 handed

21/16 - -.90
26/18 - -.03
30/20 - -.63
36/20 - +.04
40/20/>2AF - -.02
40/20/<2AF - -1.18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.