Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   High Stakes MTT (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=89)
-   -   Stars Nightly - Running Bad Latly, Confirm this is a standard push (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=551032)

Mench 11-20-2007 11:24 PM

Stars Nightly - Running Bad Latly, Confirm this is a standard push
 
Assume villain is unknown and my image is tight due to being card dead.


Seat 1: VERY_HIGH (3192 in chips)
Seat 2: cizmakk (4135 in chips)
Seat 3: tvcsa85 (16064 in chips)
Seat 4: HH_INC. (3250 in chips)
Seat 5: top9999 (9101 in chips)
Seat 6: HERO (1410 in chips)
Seat 7: slyfoxxtbb (4815 in chips)
Seat 8: Amas (3860 in chips)
Seat 9: TheMasterJ33 (4043 in chips)
HERO: posts small blind 75
slyfoxxtbb: posts big blind 150
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to HERO [5s 7h]
Amas: folds
TheMasterJ33: folds
VERY_HIGH: folds
cizmakk: folds
tvcsa85: folds
HH_INC.: folds
top9999: folds
HERO: raises 1260 to 1410 and is all-in

Rekwob 11-20-2007 11:26 PM

Re: Stars Nightly - Running Bad Latly, Confirm this is a standard push
 
i always thought this a standard shove if the dealer forgot to deal you cards tbh

hasuuser 11-20-2007 11:27 PM

Re: Stars Nightly - Running Bad Latly, Confirm this is a standard push
 
Confirmed.

WarDekar 11-20-2007 11:42 PM

Re: Stars Nightly - Running Bad Latly, Confirm this is a standard push
 
[ QUOTE ]
i always thought this a standard shove if the dealer forgot to deal you cards tbh

[/ QUOTE ]

Given BB is unknown, I agree

MaverickUSC 11-20-2007 11:44 PM

Re: Stars Nightly - Running Bad Latly, Confirm this is a standard push
 
so not standard or good or... wtf?

Mench 11-20-2007 11:51 PM

Re: Stars Nightly - Running Bad Latly, Confirm this is a standard push
 
war, what do you mean?

Todd Terry 11-21-2007 12:09 AM

Re: Stars Nightly - Running Bad Latly, Confirm this is a standard push
 
[ QUOTE ]
war, what do you mean?

[/ QUOTE ]

If Villain believes you're pushing any 2 here, then he's calling with 69% of his range (the bottom of which gives him the required 44% equity against a random hand), which makes pushing 75o hugely -cEV in this spot, -222 chips. Everything is a function of the calling range your opponent. According to conventional wisdom, a standard, unknowledgeable Villain is going to be calling tight enough (less than 36% of his range) to make shoving 75o here +cEV.

WarDekar 11-21-2007 12:21 AM

Re: Stars Nightly - Running Bad Latly, Confirm this is a standard push
 
I meant vs. random you don't even need 2 cards to shove.

Against someone that knows what they're doing I'm shoving all but the very worst of hands

furfur 11-21-2007 01:56 AM

Re: Stars Nightly - Running Bad Latly, Confirm this is a standard push
 
i don't think so. u can definitely wait for better spot, especially given BB stack, which may make him inclined to call semilight. u have almost 10BB after posting ur small. I'm shoving here w/ any pair, any ace, most kings, two face cards, and high(910 89) suited connectors.

dw2006 11-21-2007 02:18 AM

Re: Stars Nightly - Running Bad Latly, Confirm this is a standard push
 
[ QUOTE ]
i don't think so. u can definitely wait for better spot, especially given BB stack, which may make him inclined to call semilight. u have almost 10BB after posting ur small. I'm shoving here w/ any pair, any ace, most kings, two face cards, and high(910 89) suited connectors.

[/ QUOTE ]


This range is way too tight.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.