Speaking of River CRs... 109fo 6max
 

Quick line check in a not so interesting spot. Villain was 20/10/2.5 over 80ish hands... not sure if that even factors in.

Blinds at 40/80. I have KdQd in the CO.

UTG+1: RAZITUP2007 (16,000)
CO: KramerTM (4,430)
SB: redge3068 (5,100)
BB: PAYME100000 (3,160)

UTG+1 opens for 160, I call right behind, BU folds, blinds call.
Flop comes 9s3cJc. Checked around.

Turn comes 7h. Checked around again.

River comes Qs. Checked to me. I bet half pot (320) figuring tons of hands will pay me off. UTG+1 makes it 960 and I fold.

Again, it's simple, but I used to always call this and chalk it up to "if he can check that river with a straight, more power to him," never really sensing it was right.

So who wins? The new me or the old me?

Re: Speaking of River CRs... 109fo 6max
 

I don't give a random credit for being able to c/r bluff a river, and his bet sizing really looks like it wants a call. that said I can't put him on a hand that plays this way but I like the fold and do the same.

Re: Speaking of River CRs... 109fo 6max
 

KTs was my initial thought, even though I hate putting a guy on 1 friggin hand

Re: Speaking of River CRs... 109fo 6max
 

Snap fold.
Would be a weird/stupid way to bluff, w/o any good reason to. Plus unknowns are pussies.

Re: Speaking of River CRs... 109fo 6max
 

My gut reaction is that the old you (who calls that raise) is the more profitable one. If that's wrong, I leak big.

Re: Speaking of River CRs... 109fo 6max
 

aaaaah too many kramers

fold b/c like requin said people don't randomly bluff in this spot

Re: Speaking of River CRs... 109fo 6max
 

Really weird play by villain, considering you were the only one left to act after he checked.

I'd fold, but this could be a stupid bluff.

Re: Speaking of River CRs... 109fo 6max
 

i fold this without much thought, you wont see unknowns bluffing here enough.