i suck at donkaments. sunday mulligan hand.
 

evaluate my play?

Seat 4: hellopuppy (2,980)
Seat 5: Peruvian (3,000)
Seat 6: BroncoSajorski (3,070)
Seat 7: maxxscam (3,000)
Seat 8: Ace18 (3,000)
Seat 9: UnderBet (3,000)
hellopuppy posts the small blind of 10
Peruvian posts the big blind of 20
The button is in seat #3
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to YourTimeIsUp [Ad Qh]
BroncoSajorski folds
maxxscam folds
Ace18 folds
UnderBet folds
YourTimeIsUp raises to 70
your a sausage folds
A G WIJK calls 70
hellopuppy folds
Peruvian folds
*** FLOP *** [5c 6c Ac]
YourTimeIsUp bets 120
A G WIJK calls 120
Peruvian has been disconnected
*** TURN *** [5c 6c Ac] [Qs]
YourTimeIsUp bets 360
Peruvian has reconnected
A G WIJK has 15 seconds left to act
A G WIJK calls 360
*** RIVER *** [5c 6c Ac Qs] [Th]
YourTimeIsUp has 15 seconds left to act
YourTimeIsUp bets 760
A G WIJK raises to 2,420, and is all in
YourTimeIsUp has 15 seconds left to act
YourTimeIsUp has requested TIME
YourTimeIsUp is sitting out
YourTimeIsUp has timed out
YourTimeIsUp folds
Uncalled bet of 1,660 returned to A G WIJK

Re: i suck at donkaments. sunday mulligan hand.
 

call river. and if you wernt gonna call allin on the river try a check call of a smaller ammount.
if hes got a set so be it.

Re: i suck at donkaments. sunday mulligan hand.
 

[ QUOTE ]
call river. and if you wernt gonna call allin on the river try a check call of a smaller ammount.
if hes got a set so be it.

[/ QUOTE ]
worst advice ever, everything is wrong

i like how you played the hand stealth

Re: i suck at donkaments. sunday mulligan hand.
 

bigballz instead of slating people, what do you put him on.

also why is check callin on the river bad.
i would always check call here as pot control. i wouldnt bet 700 and fold when i could check call upto 900 all the time.

Re: i suck at donkaments. sunday mulligan hand.
 

The reason why checkcalling river is bad is that there are worse hands that will check behind, but might call a bet, while there's a very small chance he bluffs if we check. Therefore, our equity vs. his calling range if we bet is better than vs. his betting range if we check. Though, there's a little kink if we are unsure whether villain could raise w/ a worse two pair this way when we intend to fold to a raise.

Usually, I would say that villains will typically just call if they have AT or worse.

Agree w/ bigballz. Though, if you don't think this particular villain will have/call w/ a worse hand that won't bet if you check, then c/c might be better. This is not usually the case tho.

/end jumbled post

Re: i suck at donkaments. sunday mulligan hand.
 

cheers mikej for clarifying the logic of the bet fold on the river. just i do see villain value betting 56->AT sometimes.

Re: i suck at donkaments. sunday mulligan hand.
 

[ QUOTE ]
*** RIVER *** [5c 6c Ac Qs] [Th]
YourTimeIsUp has 15 seconds left to act
YourTimeIsUp bets 760

[/ QUOTE ]


Didn't like the hand until I saw this.

Re: i suck at donkaments. sunday mulligan hand.
 

I would check call the river

Re: i suck at donkaments. sunday mulligan hand.
 

I play it the same.

Re: i suck at donkaments. sunday mulligan hand.
 

this would be a better thread if you cut the river action out IMO.

also I probably check/call, solely because being blown off your hand here is a much bigger disaster than missing a few hundred in value at the end. but I do feel like it's close.