ESPN analysts miscues
 

How many times do I have to listen to these guys before they get it right?
Amnon still has Queen's up!?
On a 99Q9 board??
Where do they get these guys?

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

you dont play omaha eh...

he does have queens up in that spot. why do you think barry wasnt drawing dead with his FD?

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

[ QUOTE ]
you dont play omaha eh...

he does have queens up in that spot. why do you think barry wasnt drawing dead with his FD?

[/ QUOTE ]

because he had 999XX where XX = 2 highest cards from his hand, not queens up

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you dont play omaha eh...

he does have queens up in that spot. why do you think barry wasnt drawing dead with his FD?

[/ QUOTE ]

because he had 999XX where XX = 2 highest cards from his hand, not queens up

[/ QUOTE ]

you obv dont play much omaha either

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

[ QUOTE ]
you dont play omaha eh...

he does have queens up in that spot. why do you think barry wasnt drawing dead with his FD?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because a flush beats 3 9's, has nothing to do with queens up.

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

[ QUOTE ]
How many times do I have to listen to these guys before they get it right?
Amnon still has Queen's up!?
On a 99Q9 board??
Where do they get these guys?

[/ QUOTE ]

well they did not get them from the same poker school that you went to. It would go something like this if they did "barry is all in drawing dead with only a flush draw, and the heart hits on the river and barry makes his flush but it is still no good, But wait they are pushing the pot to barry and OMG amnon is not even complaining, what is this madness"

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

on that board, amnon had trip 9's, not queens-up.

( i thought the term "queens-up" meant 2-pair, queens high... )

at any case, amnon doesn't have a full house...

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
because he had 999XX where XX = 2 highest cards from his hand, not queens up

[/ QUOTE ]

you obv dont play much omaha either

[/ QUOTE ]


Ummmmm.... what? On a 99Q9 board, what hand does 2345 have? JT72? QATJ?

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

trip 9's with a 45 kicker
trip 9's with a J10 kicker
trip 9's with a AQ kicker

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

somebody at least should give the OP props for being right about his post since he took so much crap. he never said he had a full house, he said he didn't have queens up, which he didn't. he had trip 9s with AQ.

OP: props

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

lol. Omaha's hard.

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

Your hand analysis is correct. But they weren't hired for their poker acumen, they were hired because they’re entertaining and they’re willing to work 18 hour days.

I suggest you tell everyone at your home game you learned how to play poker from watching ESPN and those guys from “The Heartland Poker Tour” Everyone will think you’re a schmuck, and you’ll make more $$.

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

I just felt like attacking who ever said the commentators were wrong.

I have no idea what hand was in question, and i doubt i would know how to read the hand even if i had the info.

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

OMMMFG HIS TOURNAMENT LIFE AT RISK ON A DRAW!??!/

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

(A) 90% of the people in this thread are retarded. He had trip 9s, not Queens up.

(B)[ QUOTE ]
But they weren't hired for their poker acumen, they were hired because they’re entertaining and they’re willing to work 18 hour days.

[/ QUOTE ]
You're even more retarded than the rest of the people in this thread. You think they sit around for 18 hours a day doing live commentary? Really????

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

[ QUOTE ]
I just felt like attacking who ever said the commentators were wrong.

I have no idea what hand was in question, and i doubt i would know how to read the hand even if i had the info.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah. Riiiiight.

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

[ QUOTE ]
I just felt like attacking who ever said the commentators were wrong.

I have no idea what hand was in question, and i doubt i would know how to read the hand even if i had the info.

[/ QUOTE ]
lol. Nice try.

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

sorry guys, I was actually drunk at the time of both of thoses posts.

OBV he head a FH

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

Norman Chad = teh nutz

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

What's happening here? There are so many retards here? I'm not surprised anymore about the donkey who pushed AI against my AAQQQ while he thought he had AQQQQ while he actually had AxQQQ. LOL.

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

[ QUOTE ]
sorry guys, I was actually drunk at the time of both of thoses posts.

OBV he head a FH

[/ QUOTE ]

Now you're just trying to be a smartass. Nice try at a level.

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

Next hand after Singer gets crippled by the suckout in Razz, Lon says that the high door card brings in in stud. I hope they continue the campaign of misinformation.

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

[ QUOTE ]
Next hand after Singer gets crippled by the suckout in Razz, Lon says that the high door card brings in in stud. I hope they continue the campaign of misinformation.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nice. I didn't catch that one.

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

thank you, sir
[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

[ QUOTE ]
Next hand after Singer gets crippled by the suckout in Razz, Lon says that the high door card brings in in stud. I hope they continue the campaign of misinformation.

[/ QUOTE ]
Positive they weren't still playing Razz?

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

I just think it's stunning how fundamentally confused people are about poker here at the poker community forums.

And they seem to speak with such authority, too!

It's like the moment at the middle school dance, where you're sort of nervous but then realize that many of the guys there are utter doofuses and that they aren't going to get in your way at ALL in your quest to deflower pretty much every girl in the school.

It's, uh, similar to that.

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Next hand after Singer gets crippled by the suckout in Razz, Lon says that the high door card brings in in stud. I hope they continue the campaign of misinformation.

[/ QUOTE ]
Positive they weren't still playing Razz?

[/ QUOTE ]

Absolutely positive. It was about 28 minutes into the first hour. Stud8.

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

Wow:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=b-tOxQSCME4
2:55/9:18

Must be a Q and 9 thing?

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 

This is my favorite!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=X5lWbCBNy-c
4:55/9:00
9 outs!
With Queens in both hands!!!
It's a f'in pattern.