Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Other Poker Games (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   Chinese Poker 2-7 hands Played Recently $100 point (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=406476)

karpov 05-18-2007 04:20 PM

Chinese Poker 2-7 hands Played Recently $100 point
 
Here are two hands I played recently at the Bellagio. How do you play them?

1. 22344689TTJQK

2. 234567899QKAA

Velocity 05-18-2007 04:56 PM

Re: Chinese Poker 2-7 hands Played Recently $100 point
 
1. TT942 86432 QJK
or 4422Q J9863 TTK
2. AAQ86 23457 99K
or 56789 2349Q AAK

i would normally play the one picked on top, but I don't know what's best. I have a case of the sucks, but I'm interested in seeing what others do.

Velocity

MarkGritter 05-18-2007 05:05 PM

Re: Chinese Poker 2-7 hands Played Recently $100 point
 
[ QUOTE ]
Here are two hands I played recently at the Bellagio. How do you play them?

1. 22344689TTJQK

2. 234567899QKAA

[/ QUOTE ]

You play 2-4, right? I will have to put an option in to calculate 1-6 values as well.

#1: 9TJQK 23468 24T and expect to lose $110 on average (-1.1 points, 7355 sample hands).

Nothing else is remotely competitive. 9TJQK 2368T 244 comes in at about -1.6 points. What an ugly hand.

#2: I think this is an obvious AA/99 split with the wheel in the middle.

I ran my calculator which seems to agree:

68QAA 23457 99K is worth -$29 (7377 sample hands), while
56789 2349Q KAA loses $47 instead.

(By accident I entered an A9874 flush. The AA/99 split is still best over 4789A-flush 23569 QKA, which is about -$39.)

(My 100K-hand experiment is still running and might actually converge. I will put up the 200K hands for both players eventually. I also started a 1-million hand sample which should provide better hand values, but that takes a while.)

karpov 05-18-2007 05:08 PM

Re: Chinese Poker 2-7 hands Played Recently $100 point
 
In the first one you missed the interesting alternative of playing straight in the back, with 44 in front or without the pair in front.

adanthar 05-20-2007 01:51 PM

Re: Chinese Poker 2-7 hands Played Recently $100 point
 
[ QUOTE ]
2. AAQ86 23457 99K
or 56789 2349Q AAK

[/ QUOTE ]

What about 99Q86, 23457, AAK?

MarkGritter 05-20-2007 05:42 PM

Re: Chinese Poker 2-7 hands Played Recently $100 point
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
2. AAQ86 23457 99K
or 56789 2349Q AAK

[/ QUOTE ]

What about 99Q86, 23457, AAK?

[/ QUOTE ]

Not legal. The front has to be weaker than the back.

karpov 05-21-2007 11:04 AM

Re: Chinese Poker 2-7 hands Played Recently $100 point
 
You play 2-4, right?
Las Vegas and Commerce always 2-4. I never played 1-6


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.