Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=54)
-   -   Hoi Polloi's highly anticipated stat post (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=199728)

Hoi Polloi 08-30-2006 12:13 AM

Hoi Polloi\'s highly anticipated stat post
 
The discussion in this unfortunate thread generated some interest about my short-handed statistics for 3 reasons:

1. I made what is all things being equal a bad fold in the sample hand;

2. Some posters suggested I fold too much based on my comments in this thread ; and

3. I misrepresented my WtSD # in the first thread.

These stats represent about 25k hands at 5/10 and 7k hands at 10/20 (I started playing 6-max exclusively in June). Without further ado here they are:

VPIP: 27.6
PFR: 20.8
AG (post-flop): 2.38
WtSD: 35.5 (I misstated this as 45 in the referenced thread)
W$SD: 54.7

I post this primarily for those few posters who may be interested from the previous discussion. Any comments are welcome. I promise not to be defensive. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Cheers...

Rubeskies 08-30-2006 01:19 AM

Re: Hoi Polloi\'s highly anticipated stat post
 
35 is a bit low for a 27/20 style. Might be OK for 23/18 but you probably fold too much for 27/20.

Overall agression looks about right.

DeathDonkey 08-30-2006 01:21 AM

Re: Hoi Polloi\'s highly anticipated stat post
 
It's tough to say without playing with you what is correct because there are different successful styles. That said my went to SD at 20/40 and 30/60 6m is between 40 and 42. At lower games with more honest opponents I'm sure it would be a bit lower. If you want to post your party poker name (I assume that's your site) people could be helpful but I also would totally understand not wanting to do that.

-DeathDonkey

Victor 08-30-2006 02:06 AM

Re: Hoi Polloi\'s highly anticipated stat post
 
40 wsd appalls me. i would hemorrhage chips.

Nietzsche 08-30-2006 02:12 AM

Re: Hoi Polloi\'s highly anticipated stat post
 
[ QUOTE ]
35 is a bit low for a 27/20 style. Might be OK for 23/18 but you probably fold too much for 27/20.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'd say exactly the opposite. The tighter you are preflop the more inclined you should be to go to showdown.

disjunction 08-30-2006 02:15 AM

Re: Hoi Polloi\'s highly anticipated stat post
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
35 is a bit low for a 27/20 style. Might be OK for 23/18 but you probably fold too much for 27/20.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'd say exactly the opposite. The tighter you are preflop the more inclined you should be to go to showdown.

[/ QUOTE ]

The tighter you are, the less your opponents will stay with you to showdown, too. Hard to tell the overall effect, but I think that's what you're saying anyway.

The Bryce 08-30-2006 02:19 AM

Re: Hoi Polloi\'s highly anticipated stat post
 
By looking at those statistics I can tell you that:

1) You play poker
2) You are not retarded

I hope you have found this analysis insightful. Any advice that people try and give you based on a set of statistics like that should usually be ignored.

[ QUOTE ]
That said my went to SD at 20/40 and 30/60 6m is between 40 and 42.

[/ QUOTE ]

The WTSD isn't important so much as the won showdown when saw flop (multiply WTSD x W$ASD) it should come out somewhere around at least .2 in the party games if you're tight. If you can faciliate it, you'd much rather be 33WTSD 60W$ASD than 40WTSD 50W$ASD.

Nietzsche 08-30-2006 02:31 AM

Re: Hoi Polloi\'s highly anticipated stat post
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
35 is a bit low for a 27/20 style. Might be OK for 23/18 but you probably fold too much for 27/20.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'd say exactly the opposite. The tighter you are preflop the more inclined you should be to go to showdown.

[/ QUOTE ]

The tighter you are, the less your opponents will stay with you to showdown, too. Hard to tell the overall effect, but I think that's what you're saying anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]
For observant opponents yes. But I think in general you starting out with better showdown material is a more important factor.

Nate tha\\\' Great 08-30-2006 03:04 AM

Re: Hoi Polloi\'s highly anticipated stat post
 
[ QUOTE ]
By looking at those statistics I can tell you that:

1) You play poker
2) You are not retarded

I hope you have found this analysis insightful. Any advice that people try and give you based on a set of statistics like that should usually be ignored.

[ QUOTE ]
That said my went to SD at 20/40 and 30/60 6m is between 40 and 42.

[/ QUOTE ]

The WTSD isn't important so much as the won showdown when saw flop (multiply WTSD x W$ASD) it should come out somewhere around at least .2 in the party games if you're tight. If you can faciliate it, you'd much rather be 33WTSD 60W$ASD than 40WTSD 50W$ASD.

[/ QUOTE ]

No you wouldn't.

The Bryce 08-30-2006 03:11 AM

Re: Hoi Polloi\'s highly anticipated stat post
 
Uh, mathematically speaking, yes you would rather be winning the same amount of showdowns but be paying less overall to see showdowns.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.