NCAAF rankings after week 3
 

surprised I didn't see a thread yet
I'll go first


1. LSU
2. Oklahoma
3. SC
4. West Virginia
5. Florida
6. Cal
7. Penn St
8. Oregon
9. South Carolina
10. Ohio St

Honorable mentions:
BC, Clemson, and Texas

Refuse to consider:
Rutgers--- go out and play someone you gigantic vags

Re: NCAAF rankings after week 3
 

I am starting to respect you. Except for WVU at #4, this looks good.

At what point will people realize that Oregon is just way better than Michigan? It had nothing to do with motivation.

Re: NCAAF rankings after week 3
 

[ QUOTE ]

4. West Virginia
5. Florida
6. Cal

[/ QUOTE ]

Heavily disagree. That is all for now, as I'm eating. Haha.

Mostly because of #4

Re: NCAAF rankings after week 3
 

[ QUOTE ]
At what point will people realize that Oregon is just way better than Michigan? It had nothing to do with motivation.



[/ QUOTE ]

I think everyone realized that last Saturday afternoon. If UM and Oregon played 5 times, Oregon would win 4..at least.

How about some Boston College love. Winning at GT was a great statement. MT2R has them honorable mention, but very few realize just how good a win that was.

Re: NCAAF rankings after week 3
 

Wisconsin's true ranking is about 40.

My underrated teams:

South Carolina
Cal
UCF
BC

Re: NCAAF rankings after week 3
 

1 & 2, 2 & 1: USC & LSU
3 & 4, 4 & 3: OKLA, U FLA

5. WVU
6. PSU
7. Cali
8. OSU
9. Oregon
10. BC (gotta respect the 3-0 start in the conf ..... on the fast track to the conf. title game)

I'll keep UT on the outside looking in .... red river shootout either makes them a top 5 team or a team ready for a free-fall?

I'm still not sold on Cali's D, will know more in Pac 10 play.

a lot of turnover in the SEC compared to last year - UK, USC, and Bama on the upswing right now

Re: NCAAF rankings after week 3
 

I don't care what you rank UF, it doesn't really matter until the LSU game.

I think USCe is still too high but they have a chance to prove themselves this weekend.

Re: NCAAF rankings after week 3
 

[ QUOTE ]
I don't care what you rank UF, it doesn't really matter until the LSU game.

I think USCe is still too high but they have
a chance to prove themselves this weekend.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll give Florida the love. They deserved to jump over Oklahoma the way they beat Tennessee.

USC has only played a decent Nebraska team and OU hasn't anyone, so who knows how good they are....

Re: NCAAF rankings after week 3
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't care what you rank UF, it doesn't really matter until the LSU game.

I think USCe is still too high but they have
a chance to prove themselves this weekend.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll give Florida the love. They deserved to jump over Oklahoma the way they beat Tennessee.



[/ QUOTE ]

Nah, we both killed 2 really weak teams. It doesn't matter yet.

Re: NCAAF rankings after week 3
 

[ QUOTE ]
USC has only played a decent Nebraska team and OU hasn't anyone, so who knows how good they are....

[/ QUOTE ]

I feel they are a little better than decent. It is just that the Big XII really is that inferior to the Pac-10 and SEC, this year IMO there is OU and then there isn't anyone else in that conference that is truly powerful--a team that can compete with the USC's and LSU's. W/ that said I wouldn't be surprised if at the end of the year Nebraska is the second best team in the Big XII. Texas' schedule, once again isn't great which could make them an overrated 2-loss team when bowl time comes.