From the FAQ: Is this statement still true (Not a leading question)
 

[ QUOTE ]
"Which sites spot such things the most quickly?

Stars and Paradise have the best behind the scenes detection software, without a doubt."

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: From the FAQ: Is this statement still true (Not a leading questio
 

I don't know how this statement could have ever been proven true. How could any of us actually know, without a doubt, who has the best "behind the scenes detection software"?

Re: From the FAQ: Is this statement still true (Not a leading questio
 

People who have worked in a few places have a good idea about the detection tools both for their sites and from colleagues who have worked in other sites.

I can't say how accurate this answer is because I don't have much to do with fraud.

On a related note, the best thing is always to report suspicious play - it gets those hands and players brought towards the top of the pile.

Re: From the FAQ: Is this statement still true (Not a leading question)
 

My honest answer would be that I don't know.

Party seem to have improved a lot in recent times, and there are many sites that used to be small and pretty rubbish that are now a fair size and have spent money.

Lori

Re: From the FAQ: Is this statement still true (Not a leading questio
 

[ QUOTE ]
I don't know how this statement could have ever been proven true. How could any of us actually know, without a doubt, who has the best "behind the scenes detection software"?

[/ QUOTE ]

It could never have been proved true. However it was very obvious for a very long time that these two were head and shoulders above the others.

The whole forum read the FAQ through several times, and that statement was never a problem at the time.

Lori