NL100: backdoor flush is met with resistence.
 

Opponent is passive and bad. He's really passive and slow plays.

Hero has been aggro.

Villain ($65)
Hero ($100)

Villain limps, Hero checks with 8c7c.

Flop: K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 10 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

Hero checks, Villain checks.

Turn: Q [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

Hero checks, Villain bets $1, Hero calls.

River: K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

Hero checks, Villain bets $4, Hero raises to $9, Villain raises to $28.

Is there any legitimate reason to call here?

EDIT: IF A DECENT CONVERTER FOR FULL TILT EXISTED, I WOULDN'T HAVE TO COPY THIS STUFF. Fixed.

Barry

Re: NL100: backdoor flush is met with resistence.
 

Too many K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] imo

edit: too many 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

Re: NL100: backdoor flush is met with resistence.
 

Raise more on the river and fold to a 3-bet given the reads.

Re: NL100: backdoor flush is met with resistence.
 

Re: NL100: backdoor flush is met with resistence.
 

[ QUOTE ]
Raise more on the river and fold to a 3-bet given the reads.

[/ QUOTE ]

I played this hand severely bad on the river.

Barry

Re: NL100: backdoor flush is met with resistence.
 

I would call - I think he does that with trips often enough to make it profitable

btw terrible min-raise imo on river but u already know that