Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Sporting Events (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=48)
-   -   2007 Pac 10 football thread (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=497149)

bernie 09-09-2007 04:21 PM

2007 Pac 10 football thread
 
Because the Pac deserves their own thread.

Husky stadium was LOUD yesterday. Big win for the Huskies.

Overall, Pac 10 looks pretty good this year.

b

Gregatron 09-09-2007 04:34 PM

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
Because the Pac deserves their own thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed.

SEC > PAC 10 >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone else

EDIT to add:

I was quite impressed with Cal a week ago and Oregon this week. Also, Washington under Willingham is looking solid so far, and I expect big things from ASU under Erickson in the coming years. The future is bright for you guys IMO.

TomCollins 09-09-2007 04:35 PM

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Because the Pac deserves their own thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed.

PAC 10 > Big East >>>>>>> SEC >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone else

[/ QUOTE ]

VayaConDios 09-09-2007 04:38 PM

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Because the Pac deserves their own thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed.

PAC 10 > Big East >>>>>>> SEC>>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone else

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

I know college football is at least partially about delusional homerism, but this is just, wow.

Gregatron 09-09-2007 04:39 PM

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Because the Pac deserves their own thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed.

PAC 10 > Big East >>>>>>> SEC>>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone else

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

I know college football is at least partially about delusional homerism, but this is just, wow.

[/ QUOTE ]
He's not serious.

I hope.

If not, I agree, wow.

TomCollins 09-09-2007 05:05 PM

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Because the Pac deserves their own thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed.

PAC 10 > Big East >>>>>>> SEC>>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone else

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

I know college football is at least partially about delusional homerism, but this is just, wow.

[/ QUOTE ]
He's not serious.

I hope.

If not, I agree, wow.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm a huge Big East hater, and have no interest in the Pac 10.
SEC has looked hugely disappointing so far. Florida has played creampuffs, so its impossible to judge them. Tennessee looks like garbage. Auburn looks horrible. Vandy is Vandy. UK has played creampuffs and is UK, so no need to give them any credit yet. SC struggles with La-La, but beats UGA at home. UGA looks great one week but like ass the next. Bama looks decent but not great. Arkansas has played 1 game against Troy, too early to tell. Ole Miss and MSU- LOL.

So basically the SEC has been disappointing.

Big East looks real good deep. UofL and WV are probably overrated. Cincinnati, USF, Rutgers all look pretty damn good. Uconn looks respectable. Pitt has played no one, but hasn't disappointed yet. Syracuse blows big time.

JackWhite 09-09-2007 05:13 PM

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 
I was extremely impressed with Washington's young QB. It is nice to see the program coming back. During the glory years in the early 90's, Washington might have had the biggest home field advantage of any team in college football.

Gregatron 09-09-2007 05:17 PM

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 
Fair enough -- at least you outlined your argument. I still totally disagree that they are a better conference, but this is a PAC 10 thread, so I won't take it any farther. Perhaps you should x post this in the SEC thread.


************************************************** *******
I will be very impressed if USC manages to run the table this year. I'm also looking forward to catching the Cal-Oregon game, which should be awesome (hopefully it will be nationally televised).

I would not be surprised to see UW pull off some upsets this year. They might be top 25 worthy.

TomCollins 09-09-2007 05:19 PM

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
Fair enough -- at least you outlined your argument. I still totally disagree that they are a better conference, but this is a PAC 10 thread, so I won't take it any farther. Perhaps you should x post this in the SEC thread.


************************************************** *******
I will be very impressed if USC manages to run the table this year. I'm also looking forward to catching the Cal-Oregon game, which should be awesome (hopefully it will be nationally televised).

I would not be surprised to see UW pull off some upsets this year. They might be top 25 worthy.

[/ QUOTE ]

As an tOSU fan, UW scares the hell out of me for next week.

VayaConDios 09-09-2007 05:20 PM

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Fair enough -- at least you outlined your argument. I still totally disagree that they are a better conference, but this is a PAC 10 thread, so I won't take it any farther. Perhaps you should x post this in the SEC thread.


************************************************** *******
I will be very impressed if USC manages to run the table this year. I'm also looking forward to catching the Cal-Oregon game, which should be awesome (hopefully it will be nationally televised).

I would not be surprised to see UW pull off some upsets this year. They might be top 25 worthy.

[/ QUOTE ]

As an tOSU fan, UW scares the hell out of me for next week.

[/ QUOTE ]

You would think a Buckeyes fan, of all people, would have respect for the SEC.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.