Re: ***uNL Microbrew Thread*** NOV 2007 (ot)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Lolz at running above 10ptbb/100

[/ QUOTE ]

at NL10 definitely possible!

i've seen some people having 10+PTBB/100 at NL25

Re: ***uNL Microbrew Thread*** NOV 2007 (ot)
 

Yeah bit naíve running at 10ptbb/100 but i have done it before over 10k samples at 10nl... probably was running super hot. Was just some perfect guidelines i wanted to set.

Re: ***uNL Microbrew Thread*** NOV 2007 (ot)
 

Sure .. and it is also not impossible at 25NL, but then it starts to hurt [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: ***uNL Microbrew Thread*** NOV 2007 (ot)
 

i am aiming at 10PTBB/100 at NL10 as well over 10k hands

Re: ***uNL Microbrew Thread*** NOV 2007 (ot)
 

I would be happy to win 5ptBB/100 at 100NL over 10k hands...

Re: ***uNL Microbrew Thread*** NOV 2007 (ot)
 

[ QUOTE ]
I would be happy to win 5ptBB/100 at 100NL over 10k hands...

[/ QUOTE ]

dito

Re: ***uNL Microbrew Thread*** NOV 2007 (ot)
 

Bah that $100 turbo sat to FTOPS main event starts at 7:30, not 8:30 [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
time for bed then, have to be up in 6 hours

Re: ***uNL Microbrew Thread*** NOV 2007 (ot)
 

Don't want to blur the lines between micro nl and small stakes nl.
I see it as each level you go up, the average experience, of the regulars, at the table rises. So starting at 2nl or 5nl. The regulars, who are building roles, is low. People play bad.
10nl has more regs, play is still bad but much more regulars, who have more experience than 5nl.
25nl will have alot more regs, alot more experience at the tables, but regular players will still have lots of flaw.
Tables at 50nl will have a high proportion of regulars, mistakes become more costly, ABC play begins to bring your winrate down.

What is 100nl like on a scale like this?

Re: ***uNL Microbrew Thread*** NOV 2007 (ot)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would be happy to win 5ptBB/100 at 200nl over 10k hands...

[/ QUOTE ]

dito

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: ***uNL Microbrew Thread*** NOV 2007 (ot)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Don't want to blur the lines between micro nl and small stakes nl.
I see it as each level you go up, the average experience, of the regulars, at the table rises. So starting at 2nl or 5nl. The regulars, who are building roles, is low. People play bad.
10nl has more regs, play is still bad but much more regulars, who have more experience than 5nl.
25nl will have alot more regs, alot more experience at the tables, but regular players will still have lots of flaw.
Tables at 50nl will have a high proportion of regulars, mistakes become more costly, ABC play begins to bring your winrate down.

What is 100nl like on a scale like this?

[/ QUOTE ]


lol at ABC play bringing your winrate down at 100nl. It´s prob the most profitable. I´m winning at 200nl playing an abc TAG style. (although not over a large sample size)