100NL, flush draw in position on LAG and a short-stacked real-hand
 

No read on MP1, MP3 is playing every hand and pot-sized continuations seem standard for him. I know I can't fold to the raise once I call the 12, but I am curious if anyone thinks pushing the flop is a better option.

Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 9 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $214.50
BB: $37.45
UTG: $42.20
UTG+1: $94.75
MP1: $36.10
MP2: $142.70
MP3: $99.30
Hero (CO): $48.85
BTN: $98.50

Preflop: Hero is dealt 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (9 Players)
2 folds, <font color="red">MP1 raises to $3.50</font>, MP2 folds, MP3 calls $3.50, Hero calls $3.50, 3 folds

Flop: ($12) 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (3 Players)
MP1 checks, <font color="red">MP3 bets $12.00</font>, Hero calls $12.00, <font color="red">MP1 raises all-in to $32.60</font>, MP3 folds, Hero calls $20.60

Turn: ($89.20) 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

River: ($89.20) 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

Pot Size: $89.20 ($3 Rake)

Re: 100NL, flush draw in position on LAG and a short-stacked real-hand
 

Pushing the flop would be bad I think unless you like shoveling money into dry side pots against crazy unpredictable retards with only a flush draw

Re: 100NL, flush draw in position on LAG and a short-stacked real-hand
 

pushing the flop instead of calling the 12 wouldn't be shoveling into a dry side pot, correct?

i guess without a read on MP1 it's really tough to say whether he's capable of folding Q's - 9's, i guess what i'm really looking for is what types of situations 100 &amp; 200 NL regs push flush/OES draws (if any at all). i'm a nit by nature (see username) and looking for the right spots to open up my game a bit at these levels. any comments are appreciated.