Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   News, Views, and Gossip (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   % of on-line winners that are 2+2? (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=496410)

ebepse 09-09-2007 04:48 PM

Re: % of on-line winners that are 2+2?
 
[ QUOTE ]
if you define " 2p2ers" as anyone with an internet connection, I would estimate that close to 100% of online winners are 2p2ers.

[/ QUOTE ]

but then again, if by "2p2ers" he means anyone who owns a horse with its penis on its forehead, I'm guessing it would be around 0%

1o BoY 09-09-2007 05:04 PM

Re: % of on-line winners that are 2+2?
 
8% max

SEABEAST 09-09-2007 05:41 PM

Re: % of on-line winners that are 2+2?
 
if you changed 'online winners' to 'online winners at 200NL and above (and equivalent for other formats)', or 'online winners that make 5 figures or more a year', then it has to be at least 80%.

if you are including people that play once a fortnight and are small winners at low limits, or live players, then who knows

ebepse 09-09-2007 05:48 PM

Re: % of on-line winners that are 2+2?
 
i know how we can settle this
pole time

w_alloy 09-09-2007 05:55 PM

Re: % of on-line winners that are 2+2?
 
[ QUOTE ]
if you changed 'online winners' to 'online winners at 200NL and above (and equivalent for other formats)', or 'online winners that make 5 figures or more a year', then it has to be at least 80%.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think this is a bit too generous. If you tighten restrictions a bit i bet you could get it near 80%, using your definition I would guess 60-70%.

Also I bet if you took the lifetime winnings/winrate of people in this thread with high guesses, and compared it to those who made low guesses, the highs would be ahead.

ChicagoRy 09-10-2007 03:40 AM

Re: % of on-line winners that are 2+2?
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'm assuming you're including lurkers, if you only mean posters then it's impossible to say.

[/ QUOTE ]

Uh, wouldn't the opposite be true? It's impossible to tell how many lurkers are winners, but we would have a better chance of figuring out how many posters are winners.

john voight 09-10-2007 05:00 AM

Re: % of on-line winners that are 2+2?
 
25% max.

so many good foreign players who don't know about 2+2. So many uNL players who are winners but post on other forums, or not at all.

I'd say winning mid/high players (NL1000+) prolly 30%

under that prolly 10% max.

davebreal 09-10-2007 11:54 AM

Re: % of on-line winners that are 2+2?
 
I play PLO8 on Stars and FTP, formerly played it on Party Poker too. For micro through highstakes, i'd say 10-20% max of winning O8 players are on 2+2. Number of lurkers is much higher though.

The player pool in online O8 is too small, so most players have no interest in talking strategy.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.