Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Micro Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=71)
-   -   NL10: 2 hands vs a drooler (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=373395)

FeNeF 04-05-2007 11:22 PM

NL10: 2 hands vs a drooler
 
Hello uNL. I'm doing my own little version of aba20's 1k to 100k thingy, but on a smaller scale. I'll be around here for a while.

Villain is 75/50/6 or so, does random crazy crap, very unpredictable but very bad and will stack off light. I've seen him put in the 6th minreraise preflop with A8o.


******* Hand 1 ********

Poker Stars
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.05/$0.10
6 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
Hero: $10
UTG+1: $17
CO: $6
Button: $8.85
SB: $2.40
BB: $20.65

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is UTG with T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
<font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $0.5</font>, 4 folds, BB calls.

Flop: 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($1.05, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">BB bets $0.5</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $2.2</font>, BB calls.

Turn: A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($5.45, 2 players)
BB checks, Hero?

******* Hand 2 ********

Poker Stars
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.05/$0.10
4 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $10
UTG+1: $17
UTG: $12.10
Button: $15.35
Hero: $10.70
BB: $8.90

Pre-flop: (4 players) Hero is SB with K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
UTG folds, Button calls, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $0.5</font>, BB folds, Button calls.

Flop: K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($1.1, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $0.9</font>, Button calls.

Turn: 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($2.9, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $1.9</font>, Button calls.

River: 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($6.7, 2 players)
Hero?

gedanken 04-06-2007 02:12 AM

Re: NL10: 2 hands vs a drooler
 
let's see, I have about 6 posts and you have 3000+, and I expect the experience ratio isn't even that close...

so this is to test ME, right?

both hands, I'm checking and calling a reasonable bet (which will be likely). We're probably ahead, but I'm not eager to give him a chance to make a big raise that gives me a decision to make.

wait for the monster. these guys show the craziest straights and boats if you go to war with two pair or less.

how'd I do?

IshiP2U 04-06-2007 02:23 AM

Re: NL10: 2 hands vs a drooler
 
If this guy is really bad why don't you just shove the flop in both of these hands?

Diamond Lie 04-06-2007 02:33 AM

Re: NL10: 2 hands vs a drooler
 
I think I check behind on the turn in hand 1, re-evaluate on the river.

Hand 2 bet more on the turn, push the river

Good luck with the challenge : ) (I cant take SNGs anymore)

mynameisjoe 04-06-2007 02:34 AM

Re: NL10: 2 hands vs a drooler
 
Hand 1: c river(unless you improve to trips)
Hand 2: I think he has a weaker K here but to be safe, CC it since hes a maniac

gedanken 04-06-2007 02:37 AM

Re: NL10: 2 hands vs a drooler
 

[ QUOTE ]
If this guy is really bad why don't you just shove the flop in both of these hands?

[/ QUOTE ]


because he'll fold with nothing, and we lose future streets of value, OR he'll call with that nightmare hand and we lose our stack -- there's no upside.

FeNeF 04-06-2007 02:39 AM

Re: NL10: 2 hands vs a drooler
 
[ QUOTE ]
wait for the monster. these guys show the craziest straights and boats if you go to war with two pair or less.


[/ QUOTE ]
This makes no sense. This guy is playing and raising with most of his hands. Going passive with anything worse than a set is a really good way to get run over. Your 2 pair will be good a huge % of the time against someone like this.

gedanken 04-06-2007 02:53 AM

Re: NL10: 2 hands vs a drooler
 
yes, I'm still learning how to handle them. But just because he's 70% before the flop doesn't mean he'll call every bet after. Many players like this are very good at letting go when they're beaten, but getting you to hang yourself when they've got an "unlikely" monster -- which they have way more often than you or me.

They live by that loose image. I've seen people spend a lot of money trying to play sheriff against them.

advice to raise more when you're ahead seems good. I misread Iship2u -- raising more FLOP is good.

Mike MacIntosh 04-06-2007 09:14 AM

Re: NL10: 2 hands vs a drooler
 
Hand 1 - Make it 3.5x or 4x PF. I love the flop action (of course). I check the turn, keeps the pot small when we are behind, and picks up tremendous value from this player on the river.

Hand 2 - C/C river for value.

EMc 04-06-2007 09:35 AM

Re: NL10: 2 hands vs a drooler
 
Im betting the turn in hand 1. If he calls check behind on the river. If you check here you pretty much have to call a river bet on a blank river, so why not bet here instead for near the same out and get more value when you are ahead and still have some equity when you are behind. Protects against the FD too.

Hand 2- Im gonna block here I think. Lead for like 1/2 potish, maybe he folds a flush once in a while, you will have the best hand once in a while. Keeps the pot smaller IMO.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.