Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   High Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=21)
-   -   question for the nose bleeders (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=434197)

Acemanhattan 06-23-2007 04:01 PM

question for the nose bleeders
 
I was wondering if the majority of you climbed to these ranks as Multitablers, or just playing a few tables at a time? I realize that there is prob an even mixture of both, so its hard to say, but ive noticed while cts seemed to be big on multitableing coming up while rugby seemed to focus best on just a few tables, and both have climbed to the top. Would you say that at some point (lower levels 100nl 200nl) everyone on here was a M.Ter, and that as you moved up it was more whatever your style dictated, or have there been some that have moved up (quickly) just playing three tables as opposed to 8?

Statutory 06-23-2007 05:35 PM

Re: question for the nose bleeders
 
Couple points.

1. 3-4 Tables is multitabling.

2. Very few people are quick enough to 8+ table 6mx nl.

3. Playing more tables may allow some to build their bankrolls quicker and move up quicker.

4. However, playing less tables lets a player improve their skillz so they may actually be able to beat the next leve.

It reallly just depends on the player and how fast they can analyze and make good decisions.

Bill King 06-23-2007 07:48 PM

Re: question for the nose bleeders
 
i duno, i used to think playing a ton of tables was the way to go.. but i play 4 now and i think thats optimal for my A. ability to learn and play like 10 times better and B. not feel hurried and make loose calls b/c i need 2 more tables.

but just like statutory said, just b/c you beat a level playing ABC and build your roll doesnt mean you can beat the next level, if you plan on moving up. (which most of us degenerates long to do)

Dan BRIGHT 06-23-2007 09:44 PM

Re: question for the nose bleeders
 
try doing a handstand. If that doesnt work maybe startle them by filling a paper bag with air and popping it. Finally, you could try to pour water up it.

hardkAre 06-23-2007 09:52 PM

Re: question for the nose bleeders
 
Statutory has a couple of very good points.

Morrek 06-23-2007 10:17 PM

Re: question for the nose bleeders
 
[ QUOTE ]
try doing a handstand. If that doesnt work maybe startle them by filling a paper bag with air and popping it. Finally, you could try to pour water up it.

[/ QUOTE ]

omg it's dan bright?

Acemanhattan 06-24-2007 05:07 AM

Re: question for the nose bleeders
 
[ QUOTE ]
try doing a handstand. If that doesnt work maybe startle them by filling a paper bag with air and popping it. Finally, you could try to pour water up it.

[/ QUOTE ]
Slow down dan, most of the solutions you chimed in with are simply far to technical, im just a little low stakes no limit player. At least my post gives you a perfect oppertunity to say something that will impress all your boyfriends ...hehehehehhe....dans so funny

intensity 06-24-2007 05:25 AM

Re: question for the nose bleeders
 
[ QUOTE ]
try doing a handstand. If that doesnt work maybe startle them by filling a paper bag with air and popping it. Finally, you could try to pour water up it.

[/ QUOTE ]

DAN YOU'RE BACK

Dan BRIGHT 06-24-2007 05:29 AM

Re: question for the nose bleeders
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
try doing a handstand. If that doesnt work maybe startle them by filling a paper bag with air and popping it. Finally, you could try to pour water up it.

[/ QUOTE ]
Slow down dan, most of the solutions you chimed in with are simply far to technical, im just a little low stakes no limit player. At least my post gives you a perfect oppertunity to say something that will impress all your boyfriends ...hehehehehhe....dans so funny

[/ QUOTE ]

stop hitting on me creeeeeeeeeep!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! boys are yucky. girls are soft and wet


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.