Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Affiliates/RakeBack (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=53)
-   -   Pacific Poker rakeback problem (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=531756)

BrickWall 10-26-2007 08:14 AM

Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
Anyone else getting stiffed on their Pacific Poker rakeback?

BigDan9 11-04-2007 07:51 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
I thought the general consensus was that there are no legit Pacific RB deals. As a result, I'm afraid you might be getting stiffed by a dodgy character...

Ballerpoker 11-04-2007 08:10 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
Because this is not allowed its hard to find trustworthy affiliates offering this.

LouisCyphre 11-04-2007 09:56 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
If you can't resolve this issue, please name the affiliate in question.

RedBarracuda 11-04-2007 07:16 PM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
i think that Pacific changed their policy recently and allows for affiliates to "give incentives" to their players..

i kinda think my aff. is giving me less then i deserve.. at least it's less then what PT registers x 25%

GreatRakeback 11-05-2007 07:09 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
[ QUOTE ]

i kinda think my aff. is giving me less then i deserve.. at least it's less then what PT registers x 25%

[/ QUOTE ]
I think it`s NET rake method like fulltilt.

BrickWall 11-05-2007 09:22 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
[ QUOTE ]
If you can't resolve this issue, please name the affiliate in question.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm going to give him a couple more days. If not resolved I will name him then.

RedBarracuda 11-06-2007 08:04 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

i kinda think my aff. is giving me less then i deserve.. at least it's less then what PT registers x 25%

[/ QUOTE ]
I think it`s NET rake method like fulltilt.

[/ QUOTE ]
meaning?

mocky 11-07-2007 05:11 PM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
So OP whats the latest here then?

BrickWall 11-08-2007 08:38 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
the deadbeat's name here is: biggie12

anyone actually getting paid by this guy?

GreatRakeback 11-08-2007 09:46 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
Sorry for that comment but..... if you take advantage of semi-legal offers from unknown affiliates you dont have to wonder why you get cheated.

RedBarracuda 11-08-2007 09:57 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
[ QUOTE ]
the deadbeat's name here is: biggie12

anyone actually getting paid by this guy?

[/ QUOTE ]
I got an offer from this guy but I didn't trust him since his offerings were way too good for that kind of deal, and i did some digging and found out that the max Pacific is paying is 30% which means that a player can't get more then that.
This guy was advertising up to 40% as far as I remember... and that's reserved exclusively for 888's casino and not poker..

PNBkid 11-08-2007 01:44 PM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
Hi Brickwall,

Im not sure what the story is but ive recieved several months of rakeback from biggie12 on parific poker and an ipoker site.

This months payment and last months payment was not made to me. I understand that the affiliate went in for eye surgery i believe we will get our money since he has paid me out close to 10k.

i will let you know if i hear anything from him i except to hear something soon.

vule2323 11-08-2007 02:26 PM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
Hi guys,

can anybody tell me do they get exact rakeback as in pokertracker stats ? I registered at two different rakeback affiliates and none were the same as in pokertrackers I also tryed myself to be affiliate and played a little, still didnt get the same rake as pokertracker showed me.

Just wondering if anyone has the same stats.

Thanks

Bobo Fett 11-08-2007 03:32 PM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
[ QUOTE ]
Hi guys,

can anybody tell me do they get exact rakeback as in pokertracker stats ? I registered at two different rakeback affiliates and none were the same as in pokertrackers I also tryed myself to be affiliate and played a little, still didnt get the same rake as pokertracker showed me.

Just wondering if anyone has the same stats.

Thanks

[/ QUOTE ]
For starters it will depend on whether the site uses the contributed or dealt method, and whether they deduct for anything.

vule2323 11-08-2007 06:25 PM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
Well I know they deduct signup bonuses and points for cash, but I dont know if the rake is contributed or dealt. I wrote to them twice as a affiliate, just asking how do I receive my revenue from players, do they have to put any money on the table, or can they only be dealt cards and I still receive some revenue. Didnt get an answer then. Their affiliate staff take very long to answer or they dont answer at all.

Joonas81 11-08-2007 07:59 PM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem *DELETED*
 
Post deleted by Pokeraddict

Flintoff 11-09-2007 12:53 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
the deadbeat's name here is: biggie12

anyone actually getting paid by this guy?

[/ QUOTE ]
I got an offer from this guy but I didn't trust him since his offerings were way too good for that kind of deal, and i did some digging and found out that the max Pacific is paying is 30% which means that a player can't get more then that.
This guy was advertising up to 40% as far as I remember... and that's reserved exclusively for 888's casino and not poker..

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT. I very nearly fell for this.

Municipal Hare 11-09-2007 02:36 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
I got pwned by Greg Weatherhead (Weatherhead03: it was the post count that got me) and his partner Matthew Harris (matt@solvemultimedia.com). Far from devastating as I kept my Pacific hours low while waiting for the first payment that never came.

I have spoken with a 2+2er whose 20% offer came through. That's one success story out of the six or seven affiliates whose offers I've seen floating around since early 2007. Goes with the territory, I suppose.

Unsurprising about biggie12.

DeeezNuts 11-09-2007 07:37 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem *DELETED*
 
Post deleted by Pokeraddict

RedBarracuda 11-09-2007 03:41 PM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
You guys working together or something?

BetYourLife 11-09-2007 04:05 PM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
ban for free for spammers

Pokeraddict 11-09-2007 07:44 PM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
[ QUOTE ]
You guys working together or something?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm sure you will be shocked to find out they are both posting from the same place. Bye bye spammers.

BetYourLife 11-10-2007 06:01 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
Well guzys who can't get enough get cheated on. thats life. As said 888 only gives out 30% max, so how can you get 40%? A bit of thinking would help ... I wrote to 888 if the offer from DeezNuts is a legal one. If not I think they stop their code maybe?

Pe4nuts 11-10-2007 11:37 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
I tried to have a rakeback offer for Pacific Poker from a guy, but it didn't work... Finally, does someone know a person who has a reakeback offer which work great??
It's like it's impossible to have rakeback at Pacific...

Necromancer 11-10-2007 01:33 PM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
I was spammed by someone with a link to a Nordic rakeback site offering 25% "loyalty bonus" aka rakeback at pacific. Is this legit? WIll the larger affiliates be offering this also?

Municipal Hare 11-10-2007 04:50 PM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
The Nordic site in question advertises 25% contributed, not dealt. Is that standard for Pacific?

I'm curious about it, but won't be the first to sign up. Especially not on the word of two spammers.

Pokeraddict 11-10-2007 04:57 PM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
[ QUOTE ]
The Nordic site in question advertises 25% contributed, not dealt. Is that standard for Pacific?

I'm curious about it, but won't be the first to sign up. Especially not on the word of two spammers.

[/ QUOTE ]

I always though Pacific was contributed but others have disagreed. It has not come up in a long time though. Maybe an affiliate in the know can let us know.

GreatRakeback 11-10-2007 07:39 PM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
[ QUOTE ]
The Nordic site in question advertises 25% contributed, not dealt. Is that standard for Pacific?


[/ QUOTE ]
It would make sense cause the pacific bonus require contribution to the pot. Also be sure to know if your affiliate deduct anything from your rake.

Pokerisivut 11-11-2007 06:25 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The Nordic site in question advertises 25% contributed, not dealt. Is that standard for Pacific?

I'm curious about it, but won't be the first to sign up. Especially not on the word of two spammers.

[/ QUOTE ]

I always though Pacific was contributed but others have disagreed. It has not come up in a long time though. Maybe an affiliate in the know can let us know.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hi all,

It seems like some of our finnish players have been doing some spamming about our deal to Pacific Poker. This is unfortunate.

Here are some answers to the issues that seem to interest and concern people:

- Pokeraddict, Pacific's rake is contributed and bonuses + money transactions are deducted before Pacific calculates the loyalty bonus: (poker gross rake + profits from casino games - bonuses - money transfer fees) x 0,25 = LOYALTY BONUS.
- The offer we have is authorized by Pacific Poker. We do not pay the players, Pacific Poker does. If there are any doubts about this or anything else, Pacific's affiliate department will gladly verify our deal if contacted. If someone has already asked and got an answer please post it here so they will not be flooded with the same questions.
- Necromancer, we are in fact one of the largest operators in the Nordic countries. And we are the only one who has this deal with Pacific Poker.

If there are any questions do not hesitate to email or PM us.

Greetings from Finland [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Pokerisivut

BrickWall 11-11-2007 08:15 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
[ QUOTE ]
Pacific's rake is contributed and bonuses + money transactions are deducted before Pacific calculates the loyalty bonus: (poker gross rake + profits from casino games - bonuses - money transfer fees) x 0,25 = LOYALTY BONUS.

[/ QUOTE ]

Am I misinterpreting, or does this say that winnings from poker will be added to the rake when calculating rakeback? Sounds like a good deal if true.

Pokerisivut 11-11-2007 10:21 AM

Re: Pacific Poker rakeback problem
 
Hi BrickWall,

Casino profit is the profit you make for Pacific/888 in the casino games, not poker. So poker winnings will not affect your loyalty bonus in any way.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.