The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

The great dominic parillo has just released some groundbreaking evidence about sngs, and how his brand new theory of "expected" EV relates to them. Some might remember my post about the great dominic parillo, which was posted a few days after he released his first theory titled, "the theory of duality".

Mr. Parillo adds to his duality theory, with emphasis on what he coins "expected EV". Most think this is sort of repetative b/c EV obv. stands for expected value, so the term actually reads expected expected value. A grammar specialist dominic is not, so bear with the nonesense term while i go onto explaining HIS THEORY for the FIRST TIME in an stt forum.

the theory of "Expected EV" states that a regular to the stt comm. cannnot control what he/she expects the outcome to be in a particular hand or situation. Stated differently, even if a decision is +EV, it doesnt necessary mean the decision is +EEV. This is because the expectation is not clear untill all cards are faceup and betting is done. Keeping EEV in mind will help out ALOT with push/fold and in particular icm... remember tho, as the games becomes increasingly harder to beat - keep in mind that the games arent just being filled with regulars, they are being filled with regulars who were blessed to read any of dominic parillo's stt's theorys.

questions are welcome

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

Didn't really think it was funny.

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

no joke lego, dominic is a theorirst and this is one which relates to stt's.

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

For those of you that want to vomit and kill a cat every time fisheater posts on 2p2, cliff notes of this "theory post":

"Be results oriented". Take the advice or leave it. Thanks for the contribution fisheater, now please go do something less wasteful of our time.

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

Dominic Parillo is fisheater11's alter ego. My first clue was that they share similar grammatical shortcomings.

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

I don't know why people get all up in his beeswax. The last many posts from OP has been like this:

*** You are ignoring this user ***

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

[ QUOTE ]
Dominic Parillo is fisheater11's alter ego. My first clue was that they share similar grammatical shortcomings.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

lol oh slim is going to love this

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

i'm pretty sure your logical abilities are -EEEEEEEEV OP.

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

im not great at stts, but better than ~85% of 'solid' 2+2ers here, and dominic parillo himself could be congratted for my marginal success.

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

meh meant to quote ocean there, w/e

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

If I were in a position of power, I would have a definitive answer to whether or not you were allowed to post, IMO.

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

omg expected exepected value!

GROUNDBREAKING!

AMAZING!

OR MAYBE YOU SHOULD JUST LOCK YOURSELF IN THE BATHROOM AND CRY!

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

[ QUOTE ]
lol oh slim is going to love this

[/ QUOTE ]

I liked this one better.

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

This is very interesting.

I'd like to take it a step further and analyze "Expected Expected EV."

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

Cliff's Notes of the entire thread, including any future responses by the OP:

[ QUOTE ]
blah blah blah jargon jargon fake-jargon, therefore, [conclusion I determined beforehand]. If you don't understand it, it's because you aren't as awesome at brain-stuff as me am. There's no way I could have failed to explain [some irrelevant point] without [mis]using a lot of jargon. See how awesomes my brains is?

[/ QUOTE ]

Interestingly, I wrote that more than a month ago in another of the OP's retarded threads and it's as true today as it was when it was written.

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

[ QUOTE ]
This is very interesting.

I'd like to take it a step further and analyze "Expected Expected EV."

[/ QUOTE ]

You just blew my mind. I expect my ROI to triple from this point forward.

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

WTF?

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

fisheater,

i challenge you to IQ tests 4ROOLLLLLLLLZ.

Signed,

everyone who has an IQ higher than mayonaisse.

Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
 

[ QUOTE ]
the theory of "Expected EV" states that a regular to the stt comm. cannnot control what he/she expects the outcome to be in a particular hand or situation. Stated differently, even if a decision is +EV, it doesnt necessary mean the decision is +EEV. This is because the expectation is not clear untill all cards are faceup and betting is done. Keeping EEV in mind will help out ALOT with push/fold and in particular icm... remember tho, as the games becomes increasingly harder to beat - keep in mind that the games arent just being filled with regulars, they are being filled with regulars who were blessed to read any of dominic parillo's stt's theorys.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because EEV will only help out 'alot', a word that does not exist, I don't see the value in this post. locked.