2/4 vs 3/6 on Pokerstars
 

Hi there,

I was wondering if anyone has enough data to get an idea of how much BB/100 is paid on rake at 2/4 and 3/6 level on Pokerstars.

My guess is that 3/6 is gonna be WAY more expensive than 2/4 as in 2/4 a lot of small pot are not raked (its 1$ for 20 so all pot under 20 arent raked), making it 3/6 A LOT harder to beat for the same ammout than 2/4.

Anyone with meaningfull data on this ?

Re: 2/4 vs 3/6 on Pokerstars
 

This stuff converges pretty quickly so these numbers I am sure are good, about 100k hands ttl.
Lmt % Pot Pot Avg Rake
2/4 2.89% 24 .70
3/6 3.16% 36 1.14
5/10 3.14% 59 1.88

Re: 2/4 vs 3/6 on Pokerstars
 

nervmind you edited first

I was talking about 6max btw

Re: 2/4 vs 3/6 on Pokerstars
 

These are full ring numbers. You want to post in the small stakes shorthanded forum for that info.

Re: 2/4 vs 3/6 on Pokerstars
 

Oh right I am sorry, if any mod could move my thread please.

Sorry about that, still thanks for the info.

Re: 2/4 vs 3/6 on Pokerstars
 

[ QUOTE ]
This stuff converges pretty quickly so these numbers I am sure are good, about 100k hands ttl.
Lmt % Pot Pot Avg Rake
2/4 2.89% 24 .70
3/6 3.16% 36 1.14
5/10 3.14% 59 1.88

[/ QUOTE ]

I have about the same numbers. I always thought we would pay less rake when the limit goes up, now I understand it's due to the breakdown of when you pay rake, but isn't this is bit strange?