300nl - Trying to induce a river bluff...
 

Villain is 49/10/2, 33% wtsd and fwiw river af 17. I lost the previous pot so I only have 86bb.


Prima Network No-Limit Hold'em, $3.00 BB (6 handed) Hand History converter Courtesy of PokerZion.com

MP ($316.23)
CO ($258.53)
Button ($300.00)
SB ($291.69)
Hero ($258.15)
UTG ($447.74)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, CO calls $3, Button calls $3, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero checks.

Flop: ($10.50) 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $9</font>, CO calls $9, Button calls $9.

Turn: ($37.50) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $30</font>, CO folds, Button calls $30.

River: ($97.50) T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets $258 (All-In)</font>, Hero calls $219.15 (All-In).

Final Pot: $574.65

Standard?

Re: 300nl - Trying to induce a river bluff...
 

Looks like you got what you wanted.

Re: 300nl - Trying to induce a river bluff...
 

Yeah, fine. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: 300nl - Trying to induce a river bluff...
 

ive seen a fair few donks overbet-shove missed draws

nh

Re: 300nl - Trying to induce a river bluff...
 

[ QUOTE ]
Looks like you got what you wanted.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: 300nl - Trying to induce a river bluff...
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Looks like you got what you wanted.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm snapcalling up to a psb. Question is whether or not a 2xpot bluff is common enough to call this bet.

Re: 300nl - Trying to induce a river bluff...
 

Then why not bet ~70 on the river and fold to a raise?

Re: 300nl - Trying to induce a river bluff...
 

I def agree man they missed the point of the thread. TBH I don't think its a great spot to induce a bluff although I'm guilty of this mistake alot as well. I think you know the answer to this, next time make sure you got top 2 before checking to induce when villains got that large of a stack. Otherwise just keep this play for when villain has about one psb left.

Re: 300nl - Trying to induce a river bluff...
 

[ QUOTE ]
Then why not bet ~70 on the river and fold to a raise?

[/ QUOTE ]
Imo a huge part of his range is fd/5x. He'll have a hard time calling with a flopped pair so his calling range is probably 2-pair+, Qxcc and maybe Txcc. He also seems pretty aggressive, so I think checking the river is better than betting.

Edit: I didn't ever expect a shove...

Re: 300nl - Trying to induce a river bluff...
 

[ QUOTE ]
I def agree man they missed the point of the thread. TBH I don't think its a great spot to induce a bluff although I'm guilty of this mistake alot as well. I think you know the answer to this, next time make sure you got top 2 before checking to induce when villains got that large of a stack. Otherwise just keep this play for when villain has about one psb left.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think this is a perfect spot to induce a bluff for a few reasons:
1. Villain seems to be aggressive on the river.
2. There's tons of busted draws he can have.
3. Very few made hands can call a river bet, since any flopped paired need to be worried about the overcards that came on the turn and river.