Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=54)
-   -   Top Pair No Kicker (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=159118)

Andrew Karpinski 07-11-2006 02:04 PM

Top Pair No Kicker
 
Party Poker 10/20 Hold'em (5 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Hero checks.

Flop: (2.50 SB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP bets</font>, Hero calls.

Turn: (2.25 BB) J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, MP checks.

River: (2.25 BB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP bets</font>, Hero calls.

Final Pot: 4.25 BB

ILOVEPOKER929 07-11-2006 02:11 PM

Re: Top Pair No Kicker
 
Every street looks good to me. Played like a pro.

phillydilly 07-11-2006 02:32 PM

Re: Top Pair No Kicker
 
I dont necessarily like the way it looks
But I cant really come up with a better line
nh

ofishstix 07-11-2006 02:41 PM

Re: Top Pair No Kicker
 
Against an unknown I think I'd bet flop, check/call turn, then c/c river again or bet if he checked turn behind.

Moneyline 07-11-2006 03:17 PM

Re: Top Pair No Kicker
 
Preflop: I don't always raise a bad ace in spots like this, but I think this is something that should be done more often than not. As of this point you have the best hand so you might as well get some value out of it.

Flop: Since you called preflop, I think checking is fine because your hand is disguised, but after he bets I think you want to raise him. He probably won't put you on an ace, and will pay you off with something like a pair of queens. If he's just taking a stab at the pot with something like 87s you aren't going to get any more money out of him anyway. By slowplaying, I don't think you are getting paid off by a weak pair here, and you give the hands that completely missed a chance to catch a miracle and beat you.

Just my opinion...

Spy Dog 07-11-2006 03:21 PM

Re: Top Pair No Kicker
 
I like a flop check-call. I would bet the turn. With 2 other broadways on the board it's likely that villian will have a piece or gutshot. However, he may be more inclined to check behind with those hands, so I think we need to bet. The pot is small enough that I don't mind bet-folding the turn.

Andrew Karpinski 07-11-2006 04:58 PM

Re: Top Pair No Kicker
 
Results :
He showed 36s for a whole lot of nothing.

ILOVEPOKER929 07-11-2006 06:48 PM

Re: Top Pair No Kicker
 
[ QUOTE ]
Against an unknown I think I'd bet flop, check/call turn, then c/c river again or bet if he checked turn behind.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you bet this flop, with this strong of a hand, then you dont know how to play in small pots.

DrGiggles 07-11-2006 07:00 PM

Re: Top Pair No Kicker
 
Perfect.

I couldn't bet/fold the turn here. It's better to c/c ...he's definitely betting with any piece (or possibly air) when checked to.

Victor 07-11-2006 07:37 PM

Re: Top Pair No Kicker
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Against an unknown I think I'd bet flop, check/call turn, then c/c river again or bet if he checked turn behind.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you bet this flop, with this strong of a hand, then you dont know how to play in small pots.

[/ QUOTE ]

i havent read lately but im happy to see that incorrect advice is still dispensed with arrogant superiority.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.