Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   Baluga Theorum Adendum (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=377831)

Paul Thomson 04-13-2007 02:39 PM

Baluga Theorum Adendum
 
Original Baluga Theorm: A raise on the turn by Villain means that one-pair is no good.

Adendum to Baluga Theorm (according to Baluga):

the higher the card on the board is, the less you should be inclined to fold.

I.E. A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] on a K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] should call more often than on a T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] board

How does the new board texture change how we play the turn?

Unknown Soldier 04-13-2007 02:42 PM

Re: Baluga Theorum Adendum
 
players overplay bigger pairs like KQ/KJ on 1st board, however less likely to overplay a pair of Ts

MasterLJ 04-13-2007 02:47 PM

Re: Baluga Theorum Adendum
 
[ QUOTE ]
players overplay bigger pairs like KQ/KJ on 1st board, however less likely to overplay a pair of Ts

[/ QUOTE ]

That's the point of the Addendum if I understand correctly.

Unknown Soldier 04-13-2007 02:58 PM

Re: Baluga Theorum Adendum
 
yeah wasnt that OPs question? maybe i misread

plan9 04-13-2007 05:01 PM

Re: Baluga Theorum Adendum
 
What's the question? Call/push/go broke more on adendum boards, right?

MasterLJ 04-13-2007 05:07 PM

Re: Baluga Theorum Adendum
 
[ QUOTE ]
What's the question? Call/push/go broke more on adendum boards, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

He's saying that it's OK to go broke with one pair on boards like above.

Mjafish 04-13-2007 05:10 PM

Re: Baluga Theorum Adendum
 
[ QUOTE ]
What's the question? Call/push/go broke more on adendum boards, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

not really. you can just assume that TPGK type hands are a bigger part of opponents range, how much bigger is obv opponent specific. play them accordingly.

plan9 04-13-2007 05:19 PM

Re: Baluga Theorum Adendum
 
This thread is goofy [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

4 replies basically saying the same thing [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Paul Thomson 04-13-2007 05:31 PM

Re: Baluga Theorum Adendum
 
It just doesn't seem to make as much sense to me. Since I'd be more willing to go broke on the latter since it's more drawy and I think Villain would be more willing to bo broke to protect there TPTK type hand from overcards.

Where is my thinking going wrong?

wpr101 04-13-2007 06:09 PM

Re: Baluga Theorum Adendum
 
[ QUOTE ]
It just doesn't seem to make as much sense to me. Since I'd be more willing to go broke on the latter since it's more drawy and I think Villain would be more willing to bo broke to protect there TPTK type hand from overcards.

Where is my thinking going wrong?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because he might play KQ this way but on the 2nd hand is less inclined to play a pair of tens allin.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.