Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Brick and Mortar (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Another Ruling Question (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=543612)

kylewa10 11-11-2007 01:42 PM

Another Ruling Question
 
Any action out of turn is not binding in this cardroom.


1/2NL. I live straddle UTG, the next two players fold. Next player limps for 2, along with the next player who limps for 2 as I am telling them its 4 to go because of my straddle. First guy puts in his $4 but the second player raises to 27. Can he raise here?

TacitMike 11-11-2007 02:24 PM

Re: Another Ruling Question
 
[ QUOTE ]
Any action out of turn is not binding in this cardroom.

[/ QUOTE ]

psandman 11-11-2007 02:37 PM

Re: Another Ruling Question
 
No there hasn't been any out of turn action. When the first player put in $2 that constituted a call, the action was now on the next player and when he put in $2 that constituted a call. he may not now raise.

Rick Nebiolo 11-11-2007 03:22 PM

Re: Another Ruling Question
 
[ QUOTE ]
No there hasn't been any out of turn action. When the first player put in $2 that constituted a call, the action was now on the next player and when he put in $2 that constituted a call. he may not now raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agree. Both bets would be corrected to $4 since there wasn't a gross misunderstanding of the amount of a proper call and putting out $2 indicates an intent to limp. The fact that the straddler brought attention to the mistake ASAP seals it.

~ Rick

Al_Capone_Junior 11-11-2007 09:43 PM

Re: Another Ruling Question
 
I also agree. Any out of turn action not being binding in this room is irrelevant. He called. The amounts were slightly wrong, but this is far from a gross misunderstanding and would not be good enough reason to allow him to reconsider.

Al

RR 11-11-2007 10:05 PM

Re: Another Ruling Question
 
[ QUOTE ]
I also agree. Any out of turn action not being binding in this room is irrelevant. He called. The amounts were slightly wrong, but this is far from a gross misunderstanding and would not be good enough reason to allow him to reconsider.

Al

[/ QUOTE ]

Just to clarify something that I am sure both you and Rick are aware of you that neither of you said. A gross misunderstanding of the action cannot occur preflop when there has been no raise. Missing a kill or straddle is not the same as not noticing a raise.

klezmaniac 11-12-2007 01:12 AM

Re: Another Ruling Question
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I also agree. Any out of turn action not being binding in this room is irrelevant. He called. The amounts were slightly wrong, but this is far from a gross misunderstanding and would not be good enough reason to allow him to reconsider.

Al

[/ QUOTE ]

Just to clarify something that I am sure both you and Rick are aware of you that neither of you said. A gross misunderstanding of the action cannot occur preflop when there has been no raise. Missing a kill or straddle is not the same as not noticing a raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you mean by this that neither player, now realizing there is a straddle, can elect to fold instead of limp?

--klez

dbldwnblue 11-12-2007 01:20 AM

Re: Another Ruling Question
 
my cardroom is much more laid back than most. We do allow a player that "didnt notice it was a straddle" to pull back his undercall and muck his cards.

RR 11-12-2007 02:08 AM

Re: Another Ruling Question
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I also agree. Any out of turn action not being binding in this room is irrelevant. He called. The amounts were slightly wrong, but this is far from a gross misunderstanding and would not be good enough reason to allow him to reconsider.

Al

[/ QUOTE ]

Just to clarify something that I am sure both you and Rick are aware of you that neither of you said. A gross misunderstanding of the action cannot occur preflop when there has been no raise. Missing a kill or straddle is not the same as not noticing a raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you mean by this that neither player, now realizing there is a straddle, can elect to fold instead of limp?

--klez

[/ QUOTE ]

That is correct. If they don't notice a raise they can pull back a bet and fold if there is no action behind. A straddle is not a raise.

psandman 11-12-2007 03:22 AM

Re: Another Ruling Question
 
[ QUOTE ]
my cardroom is much more laid back than most. We do allow a player that "didnt notice it was a straddle" to pull back his undercall and muck his cards.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oddly enough i can't think of any reason a player would want to limp only if there was no straddle, but fold if there was a straddle.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.