Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
 

[ QUOTE ]
I find it extremely hard to believe you actually play poker if someone beating 179 opponents without looking at her cards doesn't even vaguely impress you.

[/ QUOTE ]

Someone needs to learn the difference between 'surprise' and 'impress'

Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
how is this sick?!? [censored] 95% of low limit donkaments are just waiting to push any 2 cards to steal blinds

[/ QUOTE ]
I find it extremely hard to believe you actually play poker if someone beating 179 opponents without looking at her cards doesn't even vaguely impress you.

[/ QUOTE ]

like I said it doesn't really matter

if it was a deepstacked, higher limit tourney then I'd be a little impressed

but I'm sure that I could win a $4 180 without looking at my cards

I don't think you even understand how little the cards matter when you're playing idiots that fold way too much in their BB

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmmm. GTFO please?

Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
how is this sick?!? [censored] 95% of low limit donkaments are just waiting to push any 2 cards to steal blinds

[/ QUOTE ]
I find it extremely hard to believe you actually play poker if someone beating 179 opponents without looking at her cards doesn't even vaguely impress you.

[/ QUOTE ]

anyone who actually plays and understands poker should be LESS impressed by this

Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
 

[ QUOTE ]


but I'm sure that I could win a $4 180 without looking at my cards


[/ QUOTE ]

prop bet? over how many trials?

Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


but I'm sure that I could win a $4 180 without looking at my cards


[/ QUOTE ]

prop bet? over how many trials?

[/ QUOTE ]

we both know the variance alone doesn't make this viable

I bet a reasonably good player, over time, could have a 10% ROI in these without looking at their cards

Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


but I'm sure that I could win a $4 180 without looking at my cards


[/ QUOTE ]

prop bet? over how many trials?

[/ QUOTE ]

I second that notion.

As much as I don't care about donkaments or donkament players, this is not easy at all to do. She had to win a bunch of 30/70s to even have a chance, let alone being able to bully all these donks out of every pot. She also ran well in that a lot of her bluffs worked out perfectly, which is a result of both skill and luck.

Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
 

didnt register for the site but WOW.

Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
 

havent seen it, but sounds very impressive

Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
 

registered and saw the whole thing and it is sick

Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
 

[ QUOTE ]
how is this sick?!? [censored] 95% of low limit donkaments are just waiting to push any 2 cards to steal blinds

[/ QUOTE ]

grando, plz play a 4/180 blind and win it. if you do so, within the next week, post ur hh and i'll double ur winnings.